"....He refrenced 230.2, saying it is confussing if they need to interrupt the service. We offered to have a plaque made identifying, denoting the feeders supplying each building."

Trick440s' inspectors comment.
230.2 does nothing for discos.He only has 1 service.
Now we're up to 230.40!? What gives? Even with State amendments, what gives?
Ask for the explanation (nicely).
I personaly would have gone with the meter disco or 2 discos. But thats not the issue.

I still think your OK (technically). But then again, I don't have to deal with this AHJ.

"We require grouping of Service Disconnects when a single Service supplies two buildings." Thats all well and good, Now it appears to be settled.
But the article# is still wrong. No?

"

Last edited by leland; 11/23/07 10:16 PM. Reason: Acknowledge Georges comment