ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 89 guests, and 30 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
B
BigB Offline OP
Member
250.92(B) says bonding jumpers....shall be used around impaired connections..... and in the same paragraph goes on to say that standard lock nuts or bushings shall not be the only means for the bonding required by this section. I thought the second sentence referred back to the first sentence where jumpers are required around impaired connections. An associate says no, the second sentence refers to all connections on the utility side of the service whether impaired or not.

Further confusion arises in 250.92(B)(3) where it allows threadless connectors made up wrench tight. What is the difference if a threadless connector is used with a standard lock nut versus a threaded piece of RMC using standard lock nuts?

Last edited by BigB; 03/16/16 11:41 AM.
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 9
Member
BigB:

Utility requirements may be 'above and beyond' NEC rules.


John
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
B
BigB Offline OP
Member
Originally Posted by HotLine1
BigB:

Utility requirements may be 'above and beyond' NEC rules.


Not our POCO. The only thing they are concerned with is their ability to access the meter for non-payment lockout and that their side is locked and sealed.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5