|
|
|
|
New tool
by SMOKEYBOB - 02/15/21 04:59 PM
|
|
0 registered members (),
23
guests, and 19
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
HVAC servicing requirements
#165614
07/01/07 05:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
OP
Cat Servant Member
|
210.63 requires an accessible receptacle for servicing HVAC equipment. 210.70(A)(3) and 210.70(C) require a light for servicing the equipment. Does the use of a 'keyless' lampholder, with a receptacle in the base, fulfill both of these requirements? ![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/forum/RS/550_HVAC_light.jpg)
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: renosteinke]
#165632
07/01/07 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 141
Member
|
I think it meets code but I still don't like it, Ive seen too many of them mangled and pulling away from the box which could be solved by installing properly. Id rather see a duplex receptacle.
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: LoneGunman]
#165636
07/01/07 10:18 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 939
Member
|
that kind of switch i am not too conftable with it but i know it do meet the code but really IMO it should have real duplex repectale with GFCI that is more safer and also with the lumiaiare i think it will be more even safer have the lumiaire enclosed instead of bare bulb there in case some hit it by accident and light go out.
Merci, Marc
Pas de problme,il marche n'est-ce pas?"(No problem, it works doesn't it?)
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: frenchelectrican]
#165641
07/02/07 01:01 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 908
Member
|
If it has a pull chain, it not a keyless then....  )
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: renosteinke]
#166216
07/16/07 02:39 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 50
Member
|
I would say it TECHNICALLY meets requirements, but I don't like it.
I see three problems: One, the bulb is not protected from breakage. Second, the socket on those dinky things are sometimes not rated for even 15A.... 660W is common. Last but not least: GFCI would have to be provided by an expensive breaker.
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: hardwareguy]
#166226
07/16/07 07:51 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 908
Member
|
I would say it TECHNICALLY meets requirements, but I don't like it.
I see three problems: One, the bulb is not protected from breakage. Second, the socket on those dinky things are sometimes not rated for even 15A.... 660W is common. Last but not least: GFCI would have to be provided by an expensive breaker. Since when are attics required to have GFCI protection?
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: NORCAL]
#166229
07/16/07 08:52 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 152
Member
|
Requirements have been met, yes
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: Ann Brush]
#166234
07/16/07 10:52 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Member
|
At least it appears that somebody shortened the chain. I wouldn't want to have the full chain dangling down right in front of an open disconnect.
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: pauluk]
#166248
07/16/07 03:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
OP
Cat Servant Member
|
Hardwareguy, I believe that UL would test that receptacle to the same standard as any other receptacle ... which is not the same thing as using a screw-in adapter to the light socket. IF such an adapter were used ... I think your point about the 600 watt limit would be on target, ant the receptacle would not qualify.
Paul - Sharp eye! Actually, over here the fixtures come with a short chain (as seen in the pic), and a simple string that attaches to the chain if you want a longer tail.
|
|
|
Re: HVAC servicing requirements
[Re: renosteinke]
#166317
07/17/07 07:58 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Member
|
Yes, this installation meets the requirements of 210.63 and 210.70(A)(3). The pullchain w/ grounded receptacle is a quick and easy way to meet code. You're in, you're out, especially when that attic is HOT!!
|
|
|
|
|