ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Happy Thanksgiving
by Bill Addiss - 11/26/20 10:34 AM
Ground fault remover :-)
by NORCAL - 11/26/20 08:13 AM
Work Gloves?
by sabrown - 11/25/20 01:54 PM
Insulated Tools: A Waste of Money?
by sabrown - 11/25/20 01:52 PM
What does your work place look like?
by Lostazhell - 11/25/20 02:56 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Admin), 19 guests, and 20 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Covering Service Riser #118160 08/13/04 12:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,632
Admin Online Content OP
Covering the service riser with siding creates a heat trap. The additional heat can cause premature failure and/or fire. Is there a specific Code reference prohibiting this?

- kduke
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Tools for Electricians:
Re: Covering Service Riser #118161 08/13/04 12:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,435
Lostazhell Offline
Is this any different than if the riser was in the wall with a semi-flush installation?


Re: Covering Service Riser #118162 08/14/04 10:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 806
NJwirenut Offline
Looks like a great way to hide evidence of power theft to me. Does the local POCO actually allow this kind of thing?

Re: Covering Service Riser #118163 08/14/04 11:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
PCBelarge Offline
I believe that California permits Rigid within the walls, in NY the Service Entrance cannot be installed within the wall cavity.
One thing I do see in my travels is some SE Cable that has been enclosed by siding or some other fashion. I wonder just how dangerous this may be? Is it not permitted by the NEC?


Pierre Belarge
Re: Covering Service Riser #118164 08/14/04 11:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
iwire Offline
I do not agree that this is a 'heat trap' conduits are often in walls with insulation.

That aside in this area (New England) this would not be allowed as this would be considered as service conductors "inside" the building and a violation of 230.70(A)(1).

Randy not putting down what is allowed in CA but that method (semi flush services) is, as far as I know only acceptable in CA.

It was an eye opener when Bill A. showed me some pictures of CA services, as a NY native he was also surprised by that method.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Re: Covering Service Riser #118165 08/14/04 10:49 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
CTwireman Offline

Other Western states have services very similar, if not identical, to California's, including Utah, Nevada, and Arizona.

Being a New Englander myself, that method of doing the service really surprised me too. I was a bit leery of having the panel and all the breakers outdoors, to say the least. But, there are millions of homes out there done that way, so it can't be all that bad! [Linked Image] It saves quite a bit of time over our way of doing things, that's for sure.


I took these pics when I visited CA and as you can see from the second pic, PVC is very commonly used within the wall for the riser into the panel.


Re: Covering Service Riser #118166 08/14/04 11:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
iwire Offline
Peter I am not talking about the breakers being outside you can find that anywhere.

The thing that I find unusual is the service riser pipe runs inside the wall cavity to a main panel meter combo that is also inside the wall cavity.

Obviously it works good for them [Linked Image] but how is it not a NEC violation?

Don't try this in our area it will not pass.

Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Re: Covering Service Riser #118167 08/15/04 12:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 518
John Steinke Offline
I don't have a problem with this. As was pointed out, risers are frequently places within wall cavities. They almost always pass throgh the attic space for part of their run. On older homes, the meter/fuse box is often set into a cabinet that was built into the wall at the time of construction; the riser then is in the wall.

On the brighter side, too often I see exposed risers with questionable attachment to the side of the building- as well as other things attached to them!

FWIW, a subdivision around here is rewuiring services to be flush with the face of the wall; everything is inside the wall.

They want to hide the pipe, I say OK.

Re: Covering Service Riser #118168 08/15/04 01:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
PCBelarge Offline
I am certainly not an expert in this method. I saw this on a post awhile back, and it was stated that it had to be rigid, with no more than 6 inches of conduit run horizontally.

I do not like the idea of unprotected service entrance conductor of any chapter 3 method run inside the wall cavity. That is just my opinion.

"it is hard to teach old dogs new tricks" [Linked Image]

Pierre Belarge
Re: Covering Service Riser #118169 08/15/04 04:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,286
electure Offline
Up until ECN, I thought that everybody did services like we do here in California [Linked Image]
The idea of SE Cable run on the exterior of a building I thought laughable at best, much like a piece of "Giant Romex".

It all depends on what you're accustomed to, and what your climate dictates.

I think the siding issue here is akin to saying conduit can't be run inside a wall. If it's going to cause a fire, then there's much bigger problems than a piece of siding...S

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3


2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman


Member Spotlight
Levittown, PA
Posts: 810
Joined: April 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 9
Popular Topics(Views)
271,964 Are you busy
205,852 Re: Forum
193,926 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3