I am glad that Luckyshadow caught the error. I also agree with Ann on focusing on the what and why, not the who. Who is not always clear and may involve many in ways not clear.
I have also noted from personal experience that when I focus on the who, the who often never hear the what and why because they are busy defending themselves or others.
Years ago, I did not hear the problem and solution when handed to me by a lowly plant Engineer, because I was busy defending my senior Electrical Engineers design of an electronic sensor that I had appoved, tested, and passed the instrument. After I was working elsewhere, I learned in retrospect that the man was right due to a borderline power supply issue.
I now have also had my electricians loyally defend me and my designs to others - reading them the riot act. I would rather take the time to discuss with those involved the what, why, and codes involved so that we all can learn, including myself for I can not claim Popal infallability.
I want to thank all those who over the years have found problems in my designs and have brought them to my attention, and those who have wondered why I have done things the way I have and asked why. I also thank all of you here who take the time to ask questions and respond and discuss issues so that we all can be bettter educated. I have been to engineering forums and maybe I should stay and help them but it is here that I visit due to your overall professionalism.
It all comes down to respecting others in my mind. Remember three rules we all learned in kindergarten:
1- Don't yell at me.
2- Get along with others.
3- Clean up after yourself.
