ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/24/17 12:20 PM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,355 Are you busy
174,818 Re: Forum
167,204 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 42 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#8552 - 03/26/02 01:33 PM Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders  
grouser  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4
Greetings from a first time poster. I would like to hear some opinions on your prefered methods for running an underground service or feeder to a subpanel such as to a pole building or other out-building. Do you prefer 3 wire or 4 wire when you have a choice? Do you use a cable assembly or run individual conductors in conduit? What type of cable or conductors? CU or AL. I hear many different arguements on this one here in central Michigan, particularly on when you need 4 wire vs. 3 wire. Thanks for any input, Ed.


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#8553 - 03/26/02 01:55 PM Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
I prefer to use a 4 wire installation. It will remain in complince should a conductive path be established between both buildings sometime in the future.

I have rarely had to replace an underground feeder that was installed in a raceway. I have replaced or repaired quite a few direct buried cables, usually type USE, not UF. I think it usually comes down to workmanship (not nicking the insulation & making sure the first 6" of backfill is free of rocks). I'll personally stick with single conductors in a raceway.

Most folks will jump on the savings offered by Aluminum. Since I'm the one doing the pulling, I like it also. Workmanship is very important with Aluminum conductors. I haven't had any failures that I know about.



[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 03-26-2002).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#8554 - 03/26/02 03:43 PM Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
What size feeders are you talking about?
I believe it is preferrable to run 4 wires and use a raceway. Just because something is acceptable, doesn't mean it is good design for considerations of maintenance and reliability.


#8555 - 03/26/02 08:32 PM Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders  
grouser  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4
Feeders would be sized for say a 60A. to 150A.load center or anything in between.


#8556 - 03/26/02 11:34 PM Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
At that size, unless your running hundreds of feet, I can't think of any compelling reason, cost-wise, not to use 4 copper conductors in a raceway (possibly even oversizing the raceway for future considerations).

[This message has been edited by Redsy (edited 03-27-2002).]



Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7679 MB (Peak: 0.9041 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-27 04:47:07 UTC