ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Unusual Well Pump Switch Failure
by sabrown - 10/28/20 04:31 PM
Look at this mess...
by InspectorE - 10/27/20 09:09 PM
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 18 guests, and 15 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders #8552 03/26/02 01:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4
G
grouser Offline OP
Junior Member
Greetings from a first time poster. I would like to hear some opinions on your prefered methods for running an underground service or feeder to a subpanel such as to a pole building or other out-building. Do you prefer 3 wire or 4 wire when you have a choice? Do you use a cable assembly or run individual conductors in conduit? What type of cable or conductors? CU or AL. I hear many different arguements on this one here in central Michigan, particularly on when you need 4 wire vs. 3 wire. Thanks for any input, Ed.

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders #8553 03/26/02 01:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
I prefer to use a 4 wire installation. It will remain in complince should a conductive path be established between both buildings sometime in the future.

I have rarely had to replace an underground feeder that was installed in a raceway. I have replaced or repaired quite a few direct buried cables, usually type USE, not UF. I think it usually comes down to workmanship (not nicking the insulation & making sure the first 6" of backfill is free of rocks). I'll personally stick with single conductors in a raceway.

Most folks will jump on the savings offered by Aluminum. Since I'm the one doing the pulling, I like it also. Workmanship is very important with Aluminum conductors. I haven't had any failures that I know about.



[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 03-26-2002).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders #8554 03/26/02 03:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline
Member
What size feeders are you talking about?
I believe it is preferrable to run 4 wires and use a raceway. Just because something is acceptable, doesn't mean it is good design for considerations of maintenance and reliability.

Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders #8555 03/26/02 08:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4
G
grouser Offline OP
Junior Member
Feeders would be sized for say a 60A. to 150A.load center or anything in between.

Re: Prefered method for underground SE's or feeders #8556 03/26/02 11:34 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline
Member
At that size, unless your running hundreds of feet, I can't think of any compelling reason, cost-wise, not to use 4 copper conductors in a raceway (possibly even oversizing the raceway for future considerations).

[This message has been edited by Redsy (edited 03-27-2002).]


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Trumpy
Trumpy
SI,New Zealand
Posts: 8,337
Joined: July 2002
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
271,058 Are you busy
205,042 Re: Forum
193,167 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3