ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by sparky. 04/29/17 05:59 PM
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,988 Are you busy
169,827 Re: Forum
163,024 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 46 guests, and 16 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#3491 - 08/20/01 03:06 PM A question  
kent  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26
Sweden
When you want to control lights from two different places (e.g. the top and bottom of a stairwell) you have two different ways of doing it (pic A and B). Some guy told me that B was the American way. Is that right?

[Linked Image]


[This message has been edited by Webmaster (edited 08-20-2001).]


Fuseman

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#3492 - 08/20/01 04:08 PM Re: A question  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Kent,

(I hope you don't mind, I had to edit your post to get the picture displayed)

A is the way I've always seen and done it.
(We call it 3 way switching)

I'd have to sit down and look at B for awhile to even figure out what's going on there! Gotta go for now though.

Bill


#3493 - 08/20/01 04:49 PM Re: A question  
Anonymous
Unregistered

A is normal and correct. B is is unusual and confused me at first glance too. But see my follow up comments below.


[This message has been edited by Dspark (edited 08-20-2001).]


#3494 - 08/20/01 05:15 PM Re: A question  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308


#3495 - 08/20/01 06:52 PM Re: A question  
Anonymous
Unregistered

Perhaps someone was just trying to insult Americans by making it far more complicated than it needs to be.


#3496 - 08/20/01 07:47 PM Re: A question  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
Diagram B looks like something you would see in a Knob & Tube installation. I've also heard it called a "California 3 way."

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#3497 - 08/20/01 08:30 PM Re: A question  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
http://www.hometoys.com/htinews/apr98/articles/kingery/kingery8.htm

yuppy, Tom is right...

it would be a version of fig#7 in the above link. refered to as a 'french 3-way' .
I have heard it refered to as a 'Chicago 3-way'

actually Kent, the guy who told you it was an American version is right, but it has not been in use for a long time.
It would be hard, in fact, to find a field electrician that actually has installed K&T as a beginner, most are probably retired.

It's comical how these boo-boo's gain names of localities.... [Linked Image]



[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 08-20-2001).]


#3498 - 08/20/01 08:39 PM Re: A question  
Anonymous
Unregistered

>yuppy, Tom is right...
Nopey. It is nothing like figure #7.

>Diagram B looks like something you would see in a Knob & Tube installation.
That could be.

>I've also heard it called a "California 3 way."
No, I think the [Chicago/California/French/etc] three-way is the one with the switched neutral.

I hereby retract my earlier comment that about a Code violation.

I have flattened out the diagram into four parallel lines (one runs only half way). Except for the fact that four wires are required rather than three, it has no problems that I can see.

I wish I could post my redrawing of it.


#3499 - 08/20/01 08:50 PM Re: A question  
Anonymous
Unregistered

On a sheet of paper:

1. Draw three parallel horizontal lines and label them as L, T1, T2 from top to bottom.

2. Draw a fourth parallel line under line T2 from the left but of half the length of the previous three and label it N.

3. Install a luminaire between the mid-point of T2 and the end of N directly under this point of T2.

4. Install a three-way switch at each end of T1 (as the common) with each switching between L and T2.

5. Observe that there are no safety violations with this scheme. It simply requires about 1 to 33% more wire.


#3500 - 08/21/01 01:52 PM Re: A question  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Both methods are in use in the U.K., depending mainly upon the physical wirng layout.

(A) is the "traditional" method, used almost universally in the past where junction boxes were used to wire up lighting circuits.

(B) is common now, as many houses have lights wired on the "loop-in" principle to avoid the jct-boxes (i.e. permanently live power is taken to the light fitting and a separate cable runs from there to the switch).

With this method an extra jct-box is avoided, as a 3-way (plus gnd) cable then just runs from one switch to the other. Less work in the roof space, but more cable.

It's also known as the "conversion" method here, as it's an easy way to change a normal single switch to 2/3-way operation.


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
Admin
Admin
NY, USA
Posts: 3,439
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8125 MB (Peak: 0.9889 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-30 09:08:00 UTC