ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Al Hildenbrand - Minneapolis - obituary
by Bill Addiss - 02/03/23 07:38 PM
Violation?
by renosteinke - 01/27/23 09:52 PM
Does NEC 551.71 (F) apply to dwellings?
by BigB - 01/20/23 10:46 AM
Power submeter connections
by HotLine1 - 01/19/23 09:09 AM
New in the Gallery:
Burger King crown sillyness
Burger King crown sillyness
by wa2ise, December 11
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 59 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#3491 08/20/01 02:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26
K
kent Offline OP
Member
When you want to control lights from two different places (e.g. the top and bottom of a stairwell) you have two different ways of doing it (pic A and B). Some guy told me that B was the American way. Is that right?

[Linked Image]


[This message has been edited by Webmaster (edited 08-20-2001).]


Fuseman
#3492 08/20/01 03:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,082
Likes: 3
Member
Kent,

(I hope you don't mind, I had to edit your post to get the picture displayed)

A is the way I've always seen and done it.
(We call it 3 way switching)

I'd have to sit down and look at B for awhile to even figure out what's going on there! Gotta go for now though.

Bill


Bill
#3493 08/20/01 03:49 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
A is normal and correct. B is is unusual and confused me at first glance too. But see my follow up comments below.


[This message has been edited by Dspark (edited 08-20-2001).]

#3494 08/20/01 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member

#3495 08/20/01 05:52 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Perhaps someone was just trying to insult Americans by making it far more complicated than it needs to be.

#3496 08/20/01 06:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
Diagram B looks like something you would see in a Knob & Tube installation. I've also heard it called a "California 3 way."

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
#3497 08/20/01 07:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
http://www.hometoys.com/htinews/apr98/articles/kingery/kingery8.htm

yuppy, Tom is right...

it would be a version of fig#7 in the above link. refered to as a 'french 3-way' .
I have heard it refered to as a 'Chicago 3-way'

actually Kent, the guy who told you it was an American version is right, but it has not been in use for a long time.
It would be hard, in fact, to find a field electrician that actually has installed K&T as a beginner, most are probably retired.

It's comical how these boo-boo's gain names of localities.... [Linked Image]



[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 08-20-2001).]

#3498 08/20/01 07:39 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
>yuppy, Tom is right...
Nopey. It is nothing like figure #7.

>Diagram B looks like something you would see in a Knob & Tube installation.
That could be.

>I've also heard it called a "California 3 way."
No, I think the [Chicago/California/French/etc] three-way is the one with the switched neutral.

I hereby retract my earlier comment that about a Code violation.

I have flattened out the diagram into four parallel lines (one runs only half way). Except for the fact that four wires are required rather than three, it has no problems that I can see.

I wish I could post my redrawing of it.

#3499 08/20/01 07:50 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
On a sheet of paper:

1. Draw three parallel horizontal lines and label them as L, T1, T2 from top to bottom.

2. Draw a fourth parallel line under line T2 from the left but of half the length of the previous three and label it N.

3. Install a luminaire between the mid-point of T2 and the end of N directly under this point of T2.

4. Install a three-way switch at each end of T1 (as the common) with each switching between L and T2.

5. Observe that there are no safety violations with this scheme. It simply requires about 1 to 33% more wire.

#3500 08/21/01 12:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
Both methods are in use in the U.K., depending mainly upon the physical wirng layout.

(A) is the "traditional" method, used almost universally in the past where junction boxes were used to wire up lighting circuits.

(B) is common now, as many houses have lights wired on the "loop-in" principle to avoid the jct-boxes (i.e. permanently live power is taken to the light fitting and a separate cable runs from there to the switch).

With this method an extra jct-box is avoided, as a 3-way (plus gnd) cable then just runs from one switch to the other. Less work in the roof space, but more cable.

It's also known as the "conversion" method here, as it's an easy way to change a normal single switch to 2/3-way operation.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
triple 3
Popular Topics(Views)
303,225 Are you busy
232,218 Re: Forum
216,960 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5