ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/21/17 09:27 AM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,179 Are you busy
174,573 Re: Forum
167,012 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 45 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#104442 - 02/26/03 07:41 AM ** 2002 NEC Section 110.26 Violations Here! **  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
HINT: There are some foreign systems that are installed directly over the equipment.

[Linked Image]

NOTE: As this area is sometimes used as a reference for Vocational studies we request that comments be kept to the subject as much as possible. Thank You for your cooperation in this matter.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#104443 - 02/26/03 12:16 PM Re: ** 2002 NEC Section 110.26 Violations Here! **  
mamills  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 745
Wharton, Texas, USA
Well, to start off, I see what appears to be copper water lines in the area above the switchgear and wire gutter. A run for the hills is in order if the piping springs a leak...

Mike (mamills)


#104444 - 02/26/03 02:38 PM Re: ** 2002 NEC Section 110.26 Violations Here! **  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
While the water pipe is a code violation, I don't really see it as much of a hazard. In my opinion, the roof above the gear is much more likely to leak than is the water pipe.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#104445 - 02/26/03 06:37 PM Re: ** 2002 NEC Section 110.26 Violations Here! **  
Elec_VA  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Sterling, VA, USA
If I remember right, attatching conduit to other conduit does constitute support! The conduit going into the panel in the rear of the photo also seems to be lacking support in a big way! (2 out of 7 supported within 3 feet?)

Also there is the open wireway midway up the right side of the pic.

I hope they didn't think of the rigid arches as nipples, and fill to 60%!

Now onto clearence:
There seems to be conduit directly in front of the hinged cover of a wireway by the previously mentioned copper.

I don't have the bible on me (for shame for shame [Linked Image] ), but I know there a number of subsections relating to overhead clearance. There is language about foreign systems allowed and not allowed to be above electrical equipment. (to quote the hint [Linked Image] ) Can't think of the rules or the exceptions off the top of my head (jost got home from work, the brain's tired [Linked Image] ).

What else am I missing?


Pete

#104446 - 02/27/03 07:39 PM Re: ** 2002 NEC Section 110.26 Violations Here! **  
John Steinke  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 518
Reno,Nv., USA
Heck, that's no surprise. I don't think I've EVER seen a switchgear room that wasn't filled with out-of-season merchandise, didn't have HVAC, Plbg., etc. running through it, and also had both exits usable!
I suppose that the part that puzzles me are the fire sprinklers typically installed above NEMA-1 gear. Overload leads to heat, which trips sprinkler, which begins Great White-type pyrotechnics....


#104447 - 03/04/03 11:05 PM Re: ** 2002 NEC Section 110.26 Violations Here! **  
Nick  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 599
Riverside, CA
I don’t see any support for the rigid conduit loops between gutters. Both sets have strut and straps to keep them in line but I do not see any threaded rod up to the structure.



Member Spotlight
noderaser
noderaser
Portland, Oregon, United States
Posts: 404
Joined: March 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7774 MB (Peak: 0.9254 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-21 14:40:20 UTC