ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 13
Admin 8
doc 3
Recent Posts
Bathroom electrical
by doc. 08/19/17 06:53 AM
electircal ageing test on IPC
by SIAME. 08/15/17 02:43 AM
electrical aging test on IPC
by gfretwell. 08/15/17 12:27 AM
"Line level" audio on Cat 5?
by gfretwell. 08/08/17 10:39 PM
Fire alarm phone lines and color coding
by gfretwell. 08/08/17 10:26 PM
New in the Gallery:
Gallery Test
Popular Topics(Views)
240,024 Are you busy
175,629 Re: Forum
167,865 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 67 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#97636 - 03/10/06 12:28 AM table 300.5  
ngoody24  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
pace,FL, United States
Has this table changed between 2002-2005? I've been using Stallcup's Master study guide and a question has me stumped. Here is the question "Rigid metal conduit should be buried in the ground at a minimum of __ inches?"

A)4 B)6 C)12 D)18

I am coming up with an answer different than what the study guide says I should get using this table. I am using a 2002 code book,but a 2005 study guide.

Thanks

Nathan


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#97637 - 03/10/06 12:51 AM Re: table 300.5  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,103
Estero,Fl,usa
6"?


Greg Fretwell

#97638 - 03/10/06 12:58 AM Re: table 300.5  
ngoody24  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
pace,FL, United States
my answer was 4" so is the 2005 table different than the 2002 table?


#97639 - 03/10/06 06:55 AM Re: table 300.5  
Tiger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 706
Crystal Lake, IL USA
ngoody 24

Table 300.5 is the same (2002 & 2005) in Column 2 (RMC & IMC).

All locations not specified below...6".

Dave


#97640 - 03/10/06 09:17 PM Re: table 300.5  
ShockMe77  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Rahway, New Jersey
That's one of the nice things about using rigid - not having to dig as deep!


#97641 - 03/11/06 09:07 AM Re: table 300.5  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,260
Fullerton, CA USA
The 6" cover requirement was first called out in the '71 or '75 NEC, and hasn't changed since.


#97642 - 03/11/06 11:31 AM Re: table 300.5  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
The fine print of the code aside, I like things DEEP. For me, this means a minimum of being a coupl incehs deeper than the bottom of a slab, and deeper than the blade of a shovel (about 12").

Why? Because I don't want the pipe hit every time the gardner plants a flower or fixes a leaky irrigation pipe. I don't want the slab to act like "the worlds' dullest scissors" where the pipe exits. And I don't want the pipe cut when the plumber has to open up the slab to replace a drain.


#97643 - 03/11/06 12:41 PM Re: table 300.5  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,103
Estero,Fl,usa
Good point about the plumber. Rigid is tough stuff but no match for a 14" chop saw.


Greg Fretwell


Member Spotlight
togol
togol
NW In. USA
Posts: 421
Joined: September 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7927 MB (Peak: 0.9532 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-08-21 10:30:25 UTC