ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Changing a Bulb
by gfretwell. 07/14/18 03:12 PM
Tray cable?
by gfretwell. 07/11/18 10:18 PM
Eaton Heavy Duty 30A and 60A Safety Switches
by Admin. 07/11/18 09:49 PM
ORTOVOX Recalls Avalanche Transceivers
by Admin. 07/11/18 09:44 PM
Tingle off the water spigot
by gfretwell. 07/08/18 12:58 PM
New in the Gallery:
Plug terminals
Housebilding DIY wiring
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 9 guests, and 16 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
table 300.5 #97636
03/10/06 12:28 AM
03/10/06 12:28 AM
N
ngoody24  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
pace,FL, United States
Has this table changed between 2002-2005? I've been using Stallcup's Master study guide and a question has me stumped. Here is the question "Rigid metal conduit should be buried in the ground at a minimum of __ inches?"

A)4 B)6 C)12 D)18

I am coming up with an answer different than what the study guide says I should get using this table. I am using a 2002 code book,but a 2005 study guide.

Thanks

Nathan

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: table 300.5 #97637
03/10/06 12:51 AM
03/10/06 12:51 AM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,242
Estero,Fl,usa
6"?


Greg Fretwell
Re: table 300.5 #97638
03/10/06 12:58 AM
03/10/06 12:58 AM
N
ngoody24  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
pace,FL, United States
my answer was 4" so is the 2005 table different than the 2002 table?

Re: table 300.5 #97639
03/10/06 06:55 AM
03/10/06 06:55 AM
T
Tiger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 706
Crystal Lake, IL USA
ngoody 24

Table 300.5 is the same (2002 & 2005) in Column 2 (RMC & IMC).

All locations not specified below...6".

Dave

Re: table 300.5 #97640
03/10/06 09:17 PM
03/10/06 09:17 PM
S
ShockMe77  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Rahway, New Jersey
That's one of the nice things about using rigid - not having to dig as deep!

Re: table 300.5 #97641
03/11/06 09:07 AM
03/11/06 09:07 AM
electure  Offline

Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,271
Fullerton, CA USA
The 6" cover requirement was first called out in the '71 or '75 NEC, and hasn't changed since.

Re: table 300.5 #97642
03/11/06 11:31 AM
03/11/06 11:31 AM
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
The fine print of the code aside, I like things DEEP. For me, this means a minimum of being a coupl incehs deeper than the bottom of a slab, and deeper than the blade of a shovel (about 12").

Why? Because I don't want the pipe hit every time the gardner plants a flower or fixes a leaky irrigation pipe. I don't want the slab to act like "the worlds' dullest scissors" where the pipe exits. And I don't want the pipe cut when the plumber has to open up the slab to replace a drain.

Re: table 300.5 #97643
03/11/06 12:41 PM
03/11/06 12:41 PM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,242
Estero,Fl,usa
Good point about the plumber. Rigid is tough stuff but no match for a 14" chop saw.


Greg Fretwell

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Admin
Admin
NY, USA
Posts: 3,503
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 5
Popular Topics(Views)
248,146 Are you busy
185,612 Re: Forum
174,948 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9926 MB (Peak: 1.1552 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-07-20 23:58:50 UTC