ECN Forum
Posted By: ngoody24 table 300.5 - 03/10/06 04:28 AM
Has this table changed between 2002-2005? I've been using Stallcup's Master study guide and a question has me stumped. Here is the question "Rigid metal conduit should be buried in the ground at a minimum of __ inches?"

A)4 B)6 C)12 D)18

I am coming up with an answer different than what the study guide says I should get using this table. I am using a 2002 code book,but a 2005 study guide.

Thanks

Nathan
Posted By: gfretwell Re: table 300.5 - 03/10/06 04:51 AM
6"?
Posted By: ngoody24 Re: table 300.5 - 03/10/06 04:58 AM
my answer was 4" so is the 2005 table different than the 2002 table?
Posted By: Tiger Re: table 300.5 - 03/10/06 10:55 AM
ngoody 24

Table 300.5 is the same (2002 & 2005) in Column 2 (RMC & IMC).

All locations not specified below...6".

Dave
Posted By: ShockMe77 Re: table 300.5 - 03/11/06 01:17 AM
That's one of the nice things about using rigid - not having to dig as deep!
Posted By: electure Re: table 300.5 - 03/11/06 01:07 PM
The 6" cover requirement was first called out in the '71 or '75 NEC, and hasn't changed since.
Posted By: renosteinke Re: table 300.5 - 03/11/06 03:31 PM
The fine print of the code aside, I like things DEEP. For me, this means a minimum of being a coupl incehs deeper than the bottom of a slab, and deeper than the blade of a shovel (about 12").

Why? Because I don't want the pipe hit every time the gardner plants a flower or fixes a leaky irrigation pipe. I don't want the slab to act like "the worlds' dullest scissors" where the pipe exits. And I don't want the pipe cut when the plumber has to open up the slab to replace a drain.
Posted By: gfretwell Re: table 300.5 - 03/11/06 04:41 PM
Good point about the plumber. Rigid is tough stuff but no match for a 14" chop saw.
© ECN Electrical Forums