|
|
|
0 members (),
318
guests, and
31
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 186
OP
Member
|
guys, I need help with this ons... given a large multifamliy dwelling unit has (2) services, The building has a (2)hour rated party wall halfway the building, this is not a true fire wall, therefore this is considered to be one building. my question is to comply with 250.58, to have a single grounding system, Can the bonding jumper that connects service #1 to service #2 be routed through the attic of the the building ? thanks, mj
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
|
Mj, there is nothing prohibiting running through the attic as far as the NEC is concerned, there could possibly be a local code though.
Just be sure to use a proper "through penetration assembly" (fire cauking) when going through the rated wall.
Roger
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 186
OP
Member
|
thanks Roger, I have a contractor that do not understand the purpose of 250.58 since the slap in already in, I was going to suggest routing the bonding jumper through the attic to create a single grounding electrode system.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 186
OP
Member
|
need help guys.... any more details to support sec# 250.58, commom gronding electrode where there are multiple services on one building ? I have a board meeting soon, and I need to prove my case for requiring the bonding of electrodes for all services. thanks, mj
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 186
OP
Member
|
does any kwows how long this requirment has been required in the nec .... "common gronding electrode,Sec # 250.58 " I had one inspector stated that it was not required in the 1990 nec.
|
|
|
|
Posts: 7,413
Joined: April 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
