ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Gas bond?'s #89358 09/11/04 03:16 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
Recently the area I work in (SF,CA) changed it's gas bonding rules. And wondering if anywhere else does it our new way?

Old way: Made Electrode/Rod and Water to Main Panel or Meter/Main combo. Bond hot, cold and gas at water heater.

New way: Made Electrode/Rod and Water to Main Panel or Meter/Main combo. Gas next nipple past gas meter to Main Panel or Meter/Main combo, or to any electrode, but not between electrodes. Bond hot and cold at water heater.

Anywhere else doing this?


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Gas bond?'s #89359 09/11/04 09:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 201
CharlieE Offline
Member
I am sorry, maybe I am a bit dense this morning but I didn't understand you "new way" so let me address the bonding of the gas piping.

The gas piping is not required to be bonded unless it is expected that it may become energized. In that case, the circuit that may energize the pipe is where the bonding conductor is to be taken from. The bonding of the gas appliance is considered to be sufficient for the bonding of the gas pipe that feeds that appliance without any additional bonding. [Linked Image]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Charlie Eldridge, Indianapolis, Utility Power Guy


Charlie Eldridge, Indianapolis Utility Power Guy
Re: Gas bond?'s #89360 09/11/04 01:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
trekkie76 Offline
Member
250-104(B) also says you can bond the gas piping to the service equipment, the grounded conductor at the service,the GEC, as well as the EGC of the circuit likely to energize. my question is how would you determine which circuit may rub through or accidentally come in contact with the gas pipes? wouldn't a CYA move be to just bond the the service?

Re: Gas bond?'s #89361 09/11/04 01:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
Why bond what is not likely to be energized?


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Gas bond?'s #89362 09/11/04 02:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
trekkie76 Offline
Member
I was just in a basement last week that had an old piece of BX close to touching the gas pipes, the BX wasn't grounded, and somewhere in its length the hot had come in contact with the armor. WELL, let me tell ya, touched the armor and the sparks flew! The cable touched the pipe, grounded out, opened the OCPD. Point is, this installation was put in a LONG time ago, and at the time, there might not have been any reason to think there was going to be a short against the gas pipes. How do you determine if it will never be energized?

Re: Gas bond?'s #89363 09/11/04 04:26 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
Here it is inspectable during every service alteration. Fail, for non-compliance of it. Always has been in my area of California, at least. The way it has been read, is that it is always been "likely to become energized".

It nice to know that iterpretation is a little different everywhere you go.

Quote
250.104(B) Other Metal Piping. Where installed in or attached to a building or structure, metal piping system(s), including gas piping, that may become energized shall be bonded to the service equipment enclosure, the grounded conductor at the service, the grounding electrode conductor where of sufficient size, or to the one or more grounding electrodes used. The bonding jumper(s) shall be sized in accordance with 250.122 using the rating of the circuit that may energize the piping system(s). The equipment grounding conductor for the circuit that may energize the piping shall be permitted to serve as the bonding means. The points of attachment of the bonding jumper(s) shall be accessible.
FPN:Bonding all piping and metal air ducts within the premises will provide additional safety.
Commentary: Section 250.104(B) was revised for the 2002 Code to state that gas piping is treated exactly the same as all "other metal piping" systems within a building.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Re: Gas bond?'s #89364 09/11/04 04:52 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
double post


[This message has been edited by e57 (edited 09-11-2004).]


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Re: Gas bond?'s #89365 09/11/04 05:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
How we determine it here is simple, if it is not connected to an electric appliance it is not likely to be energized.

It could be be energized but it is not likely. [Linked Image]

Each area has their own way and here we do not bond gas pipes except by the EGC of equipment connected to it.

If the service neutral opens do you really want the gas piping at an elevated voltage, subjecting gas workers to a shock?

Another question:

Why do you suppose the NEC even put the words "may become energized" in this section if they meant all metal piping systems must always be bonded?

To each their own. [Linked Image]

Bob



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 09-11-2004).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Gas bond?'s #89366 09/11/04 05:56 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
Personally, I find it a real pain in the end. As now we have to find a path to the otherside of a building to do it sometimes. But would fail inspections for it otherwise. (Although California, and SF, ignore this part: "The equipment grounding conductor for the circuit that may energize the piping shall be permitted to serve as the bonding means.")


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Re: Gas bond?'s #89367 09/11/04 07:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
C
caselec Offline
Member
In California we are using the 2001 CEC which is based on the 1999 NEC. 250-104(b) says that the interior metal gas piping must be bonded to the grounding electrode system. It doesn’t say anything about likely to become energized.

For many years every jurisdiction I have worked in except San Jose has required a bonding jumper between the hot, cold and gas pipes at the water heater. If you tell the inspector that the NEC permits the EGC of the appliances likely to energize the piping to serve as the bonding jumper he or she will tell you they still want the jumper at the heater. I have spent too much time arguing with inspectors over this issue and have decided to install the jumper for them. Now that we are on the 99 NEC I don’t have much of an argument but since I haven’t run across any inspectors that will not permit this jumper to be at the water heater I keep my mouth shut. Mark has finally run across some inspectors that realized what the 99 NEC requires.

Curt


Curt Swartz
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
lil suzi
lil suzi
Midwest
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
271,004 Are you busy
205,008 Re: Forum
193,124 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3