1 members (Scott35),
355
guests, and
38
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Member
|
Ok, I'm bad, I don't have my code book with me...but isn't there some language against having a bracket type light fixture above bath tubs or in shower stalls? I think the same section disallows any sort of hanging light too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236 Likes: 1
Member
|
Sorry, this is still from the '99 NEC:
410-4(d) states that "No parts of cord connected fixtures, hanging fixtures, lighting track, pendants or ceiling-suspended (paddle) fans shall be located within a zone measured 3 ft. horizontally and 8 ft. vertically from the top of the bathtub rim or shower stall threshold..."
410-57(c) states that "A receptacle shall not be installed within a tub or shower space..." which I'm left to assume "space" is defined above in 410-4(d),
630-41(c) states that "Switches shall be located at least 5 ft., measured horizontally, from the inside walls of the spa or hot tub..."
550-8(f)(1) "Shower or Bathtub Space Receptacle outlets shall not be installed in or within reach (30 inches) of a shower or bathtub space."
Any differnce in the 2002?
My 2002 book is in the truck and my feet are killing me after two 13 hour days... (Excuses, excuses...)
Paul, yes, is it a real zoo here in every sense of the word!
[This message has been edited by sparky66wv (edited 05-17-2002).]
-Virgil Residential/Commercial Inspector 5 Star Inspections Member IAEI
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
OP
Member
|
Virgil et all; no real 02' changes, it would seem that as long as your absconsa* is not "cord connected" , or "hanging" , or "pendant" that they are kosher within the 8x3 area.
This is interesting in that it would not be required to be GFI protected , and the others mentioned (410-4(d))would notqualify even if they were GFI protected....
* maybe we'd make more $$$ speaking latin?
BTW, my cats earn thier keep re;mouse patrol
[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 05-18-2002).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Member
|
Virgil, An outsider's view of these quoted rules. 410-57(c). Reading that one, I would go along with your interpretation, as the only other way to read it that I can see is to just prohibit the installation of a receptacle inside the tub or shower-stall itself. And nobody could be THAT stupid, right? Then: 550-8(f)(1) "Shower or Bathtub Space Receptacle outlets shall not be installed in or within reach (30 inches) of a shower or bathtub space."
So if we assume that "shower or bathtub space" is defined as an area extending 3 ft. horizontally from the tub, then logically this means that no receptacle should be within 3 ft. + 30 in. or 5' 6" of the tub. This seems to be more in line with the 5' for switches quoted in 630-41(c), but why is the latter rule restricted to "spa or hot tub" and not tubs, showers, etc. in general? Have I missed something? Also, the wording of 550-8(f)(1) seems rather clumsy to me. Why not just "Receptacle outlets shall not be installed....." ? Sparky, Not too many mices (as Mr. Jinks would have said!) around here, but my house backs onto sand dunes with long grass. Now the weather is warming up I get regular presents of sand lizards! [This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 05-18-2002).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Member
|
Paul, 410-57(c). Reading that one, I would go along with your interpretation, as the only other way to read it that I can see is to just prohibit the installation of a receptacle inside the tub or shower-stall itself. And nobody could be THAT stupid, right? You wouldn't think that anyone would be that stupid, but as I recall, the substatiation for the proposal was "there is no code rule preventing the installation of a receptacle in the shower stall or the footprint of the tub!! I'll try to look up the exact statement later this weekend. Don
Don(resqcapt19)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236 Likes: 1
Member
|
Paul and Steve,
<threadjack> I've witnessed mice stealing food from the cat's dish while 5 sleeping cats are unaware and within a few feet of the bowl...
The cat's (and the small dog, Pita) have a door they can use which is hinged vertically like a regular door and opens one direction and a spring closes it. They open it the "hard way" (coming in, pulling the door open) with no difficulties... The only mouse kills we see are the ones brought in from the outside... I guess they think the indoor mice are pets too!
</threadjack>
-Virgil Residential/Commercial Inspector 5 Star Inspections Member IAEI
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236 Likes: 1
Member
|
Rick, Hey! I remember that old thread now!
Boy, ECN has come along way!
-Virgil Residential/Commercial Inspector 5 Star Inspections Member IAEI
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Member
|
Proposal 9-77 in the '92 TCR and the associated comments in the '92 TCD resulted in the first rules in the NEC to prohibit the installation of switches in the shower or tub enclosure. Up until that time the code permitted weatherproof switches in that location. The proposals and comments requested that the switches within 5' have GFCI protection. The CMP only accepted in principle, and the rule in 380-4 for the '93 code only said; "Switches shall not be installed within wet locations in tub or shower spaces unless installed as a part of a listed assembly". In the '96 code this was modified to say that any switches in these areas must be a part of a listed tub or shower assembly. Proposal 9-86 in the '98 ROP would have required that switches and receptacles not be located within 36" horizontally of a bathtub or shower enclosure. This was rejected by the CMP with the comment that the existing wording in 380-4 for switches is adequate and that the location of receptacles is not within the scope of Article 380. In the '01 ROP another proposal, 9-74, was made to require switches be outside of the "bathtub and shower zone". This proposal was also rejected. In the '96 code, 410-57(c) first appeared prohibiting the installation of receptacles in bathtub and shower areas. A proposal, 18-70, was made for the '99 code that would have placed a 3' limit from the bathtub or shower enclosure for receptacle placement. This too was rejected by the CMP. Another proposal, 18-46, was made in the '01 ROP to have a 5' limit for the receptacle location. Again rejected by the code making panel. It appears very clear to me that both CMP 9 for switches and CMP 18 for receptacles are only intending that the switches and receptacles be outside of the bathtub and shower areas, but that there items are permitted to be installed immediately adjacent thereto. Don(resqcapt19)
Don(resqcapt19)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Member
|
O.K., I guess we do have to teach common sense in the regulations. So, if "shower or bathtub" space only covers the limits of the actual tub itself, then by 550-8(f)(1), does that mean that a receptacle only has to be 30 inches away from the tub?
|
|
|
Posts: 43
Joined: September 2013
|
|
|
|