ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 376 guests, and 7 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#36350 05/05/04 08:02 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 29
D
Member
The wire size corresponds with the breaker size, not the load.

Dave

#36351 05/05/04 03:56 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
Dave, this is and is not the case.(that made alot of sense didn't it? [Linked Image])

Actually in many cases the conductor is sized for the load and then the OCPD is sized to this.

Now, with out doing any math at the moment, (so don't hold me to the actual numbers)
let's look at article 430 for example.

With the applicable parts of this article we could possibly have a # 12 connected to a 45 amp breaker.

The conductor is sized for the load, the OCPD is sized to carry and start the load, and is for short circuit protection.

The OL's are actually the conductor and equipment protection here.

Of course this is not the situation or discussion in this thread. [Linked Image]

Roger



[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 05-05-2004).]

#36352 05/05/04 05:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 29
D
Member
You're so right, Roger. I'll have to do a little studying on the impedence of the combined contributors of a MOTOR switch leg. Can you help me find the table for the voltage required to beat a dead horse?

I was actually thinking of a job I bid on recently that illustrates the problem with using smaller wire for the switched pair, other than the obvious violation. In a very nice neighborhood, the homeowner had built a 3-season room. The exterior light (now in the 3-season room) had an outlet as part of the fixture. Someone other than an electrician wired the room entirely with NM, which then came out of the ceiling and was connected to a plug...into this light fixture. It included six outlets, a ceiling fan, and three exterior lights. There was another NM cord plugged into a non-GFCI exterior outlet for a TV outlet. Of course there was no WWIU cover.

Dave

#36353 05/06/04 03:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 349
Member
I figure this string might be good for yet another posting or two.

At the simplest level, the primary function of the branch circuit breaker is to protect the downstream wiring. In order to do so, the wire must have equal or greater capacity compared to the circuit breaker.

So, the questions are:
1) Will the #14 wire be adequate for the purpose Randy has intended? Absolutely, but . . .
2) Will the #14 wire be adequately protected by a 20 amp CB, according to the NEC? Absolutely not.

It's all about protecting the wiring, not matching the wire as closely as possible to a small load. That's why we can't wire lighting circuits with 18 gage wire.

Thanks,
Radar


There are 10 types of people. Those who know binary, and those who don't.
#36354 05/06/04 09:48 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
W
Member
Quote
2) Will the #14 wire be adequately protected by a 20 amp CB, according to the NEC? Absolutely not.

It's all about protecting the wiring, not matching the wire as closely as possible to a small load. That's why we can't wire lighting circuits with 18 gauge wire.

That's what I thought the code wants. That if one problem happens (overcurrent due to a fault) you don't cascade to a bigger problem (house fire). Because the breaker kicks out.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5