Note that nowadays there are two styles of ‘double-throw’ XOP switches. See http://ecatalog.squared.com/catalog/173/html/sections/03/17303014.html A newer style has two sets of movable blades and two sets of fixed jaws. Older is one set of movable blades and two sets of fixed jaws. (Note upper vs. lower photos.)
[I believe Cutler-Hammer has a similar variation.]
AFAIK, the 2 different variations in construction are a result of fusible or non-fusible design.
The extra length needed for 2 sets of fuses requires 2 separate interlocked switch mechanisms, while a non-fused switch can be made with a single set of blades.
NJ, that is a good point. I installed one fusible double-throw switch in a service-entrance application in the 1970s to accommodate a standby genset. One set of fuses was normally hot through the utility feed [with the switch open.] At the time there was an NEC exception that clearly allowed the practice.
By job completion, a prominent label warned of the condition, and a piece of clear acrylic secured with non-metallic machine screws covered the {utility-powered} set of fuses.
Two C-H double-throw switch versions [one set of movable blades versus two] are illustrated on page 26 of www.eatonelectrical.com/unsecure/cms1/TB00800001E.PDF {Aaak! 5MB file} Note also the two applications on page 24 fig. 8-7 — “two sources” versus “two loads”.
[This message has been edited by Bjarney (edited 04-05-2004).]