ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Vibrator Supplies??
by gfretwell - 10/19/19 08:33 PM
FPE in Germany
by NORCAL - 10/16/19 08:24 AM
Help with aging employee advice.
by Bill Addiss - 10/15/19 10:58 PM
Fuse blower plug?
by gfretwell - 10/13/19 03:23 PM
Power factor and transformer efficiency
by TeslaEdison - 10/13/19 04:05 AM
New in the Gallery:
FPE Breaker panel in germany
What is this for?
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Scott35), 9 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 210.7(B) vs. 408.36(C) [Re: JBD] #181005 09/18/08 07:49 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 174
K
kale Offline
Member
Both the receptacles pictured are available from Leviton stock, and are still produced.

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: 210.7(B) vs. 408.36(C) [Re: kale] #181023 09/19/08 09:40 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by kale
Both the receptacles pictured are available from Leviton stock, and are still produced.


Yes, the receptacles are available. But, the delta breakers in NEC2005 408.36(E) and NEC2008 408.36(C) are no longer manufactured.

I see nothing that prohibits you from using a 3-pole breaker in a single phase panel, as long as it is not being used for supplying 3-phase equipment. Notice, the NEC issue is with the number of phases not poles. I do not know about manufacturer prohibitions.

Re: 210.7(B) vs. 408.36(C) [Re: JBD] #181049 09/20/08 03:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
K
KJay Offline
Member
That is why I was wondering if manufacturers are still making the 3-pole plug-in style breakers, since I think I still have some older ones left in stock.
This quote is from page 89 of the "07 White Book [DIVQ]. It is the sentence just above the one in my other post.

"3-pole circuit breakers are suitable for use only on 3-phase systems unless marked to indicate otherwise".

It seems that if the manufacturer says its okay, then no problem. Not that I can actually recall ever running into the device situation described in the posts, but would be good to know just in case. They are probably worried about someone using 3-hots on one neutral conductor on single phase. Seems that the NEC assumes that we are all idiots that must be protected from ourselves.

Re: 210.7(B) vs. 408.36(C) [Re: pdh] #181054 09/20/08 07:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 61
TOOL_5150 Offline
Member
Originally Posted by pdh
For the latter, you'll need to find dual circuit cable since you can't remark the blue wire of three phase cable as an extra neutral per 200.6(A).


what about 200.6 E exception 1 or 2?

~Matt


I would rather beg for forgiveness then beg for permission.
Re: 210.7(B) vs. 408.36(C) [Re: TOOL_5150] #181071 09/21/08 01:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,409
G
gfretwell Offline
Member
Matt those are so narrowly defined that most AHJs will be reluctant to allow them in general use.
"Where the conditions of maintenance and supervision ensure that only qualified persons service the installation" will only apply in very well regulated industrial applications and I doubt anyone here has seem much "multiconductor varnished-cloth-insulated cable" at the supply house. wink

BTW if you dig around a little you will see it is OK to use blue for a neutral in "cords" but that is just to allow things here that come from Europe where a cord is blue (neutral), brown (hot) and green/yellow ground.


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Bill Addiss
Bill Addiss
NY, USA
Posts: 3,930
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 10
Popular Topics(Views)
259,726 Are you busy
195,066 Re: Forum
184,472 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3