ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

1898 Underground Hydro Plant
1898 Hydro Plant

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 73 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
Here's a typical modern residential panel using MCBs (plastic see-thru lid raised):

[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

And here's the bit you really want to see [Linked Image] :
[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

Note that we never bond neutral to ground in these panels, hence the separate bars. (Yes, I know it must look funny to you to see all those black wires connected like that! [Linked Image])




[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 07-16-2002).]

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
The individual conductors of the feeder/source look unusual by typical US practice. Even though it is assumed to be grounded-240V service, that looks like a 2-pole main breaker. Aside from being 2 pole, is an integral “panelboard main breaker” required even with the fused pullout ahead of the meter? The load cables out of the tops of the branch breakers are unexpected. {Black versus white neutrals seem more logical.}

Oddly, the red and black pair into the main breaker look coincidentally and perfectly normal, but at this end that would signify the two ungrounded poles—each 120V-to-ground.

There will always be more than one way to skin a cat.

Two more…what is the interrupting rating of the panelboard {ehh, sorry—consumer unit?} and breakers? Are nonmetallic enclosures the norm? They are fairly limited west of the pond. Seems they would be safer to work on while energized.

Paul—thanks for taking and posting the pictures. One thing about digicams—isn’t it nice not to have to send film out for processing?


 


[This message has been edited by Bjarney (edited 07-17-2002).]

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
Yes, this is a normal residential 2-wire 240V service tapped from a 240/415V wye system in the street.

Single-phase boards here always have a double-pole main switch which opens both hot and neutral conductors (although 3-ph panels just have a bolted neutral and a 3-pole switch). The main isolator is required despite the presence of the main fuse pull-out, because the latter is sealed by the power company (it's illegal to break the seal).

Note that the main on this panel is just a switch, not a circuit-breaker. These modern DIN-rail panels have interchangeable units, and if this were on a service where grounding is only to a local rod, then a main GFI would be substituted for the switch. Again, such a GFI provides only ground-fault protection, not over-current protection. On older style panels, where a main GFI was needed it was fitted as a separate unit and the main panel would still have a D.P. switch.

In general, having a switch open the neutral is far more common here than in North America. For example, the isolation switch on the "cooker control unit" I posted elsewhere also breaks both sides of the circuit, and isolation switches for fixed room heaters are also double-pole. Even some receptacles now have D.P. switches incorporated.

All-insulated enclosures are pretty much the norm for residential work. In fact, where the house ground is just to a local rod (i.e. many rural areas), the enclosure has to be non-metallic, otherwise a short on the supply side of the main GFI could leave the enclosure energized. (Where the GFI is separate to the distribution panel, the panel can be metal-cased, but the GFI enclosure has to be insulated.)

These C/Bs are GE types rated at 6000A breaking capacity. C/Bs are allowed to have an interrupt rating less than the PSCC (prospective short-circuit current) so long as a protective device upstream is suitably rated. The PoCo-owned cartridge fuse satisfies this requirement.

Quote
The load cables out of the tops of the branch breakers are unexpected.

This has become the standard layout on these panels now, with the ht busbar running along the bottom.

Quote

{Black versus white neutrals seem more logical.}

Just what people are used to I guess. Over in Continental Europe they don't associate black with neutral.

Quote

Paul—thanks for taking and posting the pictures. One thing about digicams—isn’t it nice not to have to send film out for processing?
Glad you're finding them interesting. Digicams also make it so easy to destroy all evidence of your not-so-successful shots! [Linked Image]

(Good to see your name over on Telecom Digest, by the way!)



[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 07-18-2002).]

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,503
T
Member
This panel looks exactly like what we use in Austria, except for three points: We commonly have double pole breakers fusing the neutral as well. Single poles are allowed but double poles are generally considered safer. 2nd: On every type of service we have a main GFI protecting all circuits. 3rd: Those comb arrangements aren't common here. I've seen one recently, to be exact three combs balancing the load on all three phases. Pretty nice to have these uninsulated combs 1 cm away from a makeshift metallic panel cover! U-shaped jumper wires are more common and in this case would have been safer.

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
I think connecting the feed to each breaker with a wire link must be another common European trait, as it's done in France as well. It's rare in the U.K. though, except in the case of some small DIN-rail enclosures where there are perhaps just one or two C/Bs.

There's nothing in our rules to prevent the use of a double-pole C/B opening both hot and neutral, but it's not usually done that way (I don't remember ever seeing such an installation). GFIs are a different matter, as they always open both sides of the circuit.

I can see a practical advantage of using D.P. breakers where there is a main GFI. If you turn off a C/B to work on one branch circuit here, although it's safe to touch the neutral is still connected through that GFI. If you accidentally short the neutral to ground (e.g. while cutting a cable) it's possible to trip out the main GFI. (Really annoying if you're working in an attic and your floodlight goes out!) No big deal really, but it means having to open up the panel and disconnect the branch neutral instead of just flicking the C/B off.

By the way, many new installations here do have a main GFI even when not actually required.

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
Here is a Wylex brand "Standard Range" distribution panel. This one is the metal-clad version, but insulated versions were more common in residential applications:
[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

The separate front cover unscrews to reveal the fuses. In this case I've put just one fuse in and left the other positions either with just the terminal covers or bare so you can get a better idea.

Each circuit position is fitted with a plastic cover which (a) insures that the energized busbar is covered and (b) by the size of the slots prevents the insertion of a higher-rated fuse carrier. The covers and fuses are color coded according to the system I mentioned elsewhere:
[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

And here's the panel (blush!) naked, so to speak:
[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

Note again the double-pole switch which opens hot and neutral.

These Wylex "Standard Range" units remain quite popular, partly because the basic design has not changed in over 40 years (*). It is still possible to obtain replacements for old installations, and in fact Wylex still manufactures this range of panels.

Another reason for their popularity is that the same units can take rewireable fuse carriers, cartridge fuses, or circuit breakers. Upgrading an old installation which has rewireable fuses just requires the replacement of the individual covers and the fuse itself -- No need to even remove the main front cover.

The rewireable fuse was at one time the most common in domestic systems. The prongs are different sizes/spacing to prevent the insertion of, say, a 30A carrier into a position fitted with a 15A cover, but of course there is nothing to stop somebody fitting the wrong size fusewire (very common!), or worse yet a straightened out paperclip! (A favorite trick [Linked Image] ) :
[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

Cartridge fuse carriers offer better protection, as a larger cartridge fuse won't physically fit into a smaller carrier (I do sometimes see blown fuses bridged with a piece of wire though <Sigh!> ):
[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

Circuit breakers for this panel are also a plug-in type, using the same back covers as for cartridge fuses. You just have to replace or cut out the center of the front "fuse" cover when C/Bs are employed.

(*) Compare with the old 1966 ad posted here . (The ad is for a one-way "switch-fuse", but multi-branch panels were similar.) You can't get them in brown now, though, and the plastic cases on the new ones are thinner. [Linked Image]



[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 07-27-2002).]

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
Here's what you find in a typical house where extra circuits have been added over the years:

[Linked Image from members.aol.com]

Anyone like to have a go at following this maze of wiring before I explain the details?

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 4
Member
Paul,
I've been going through a few OLD threads and seems there are a few more people at ECN from the UK, these days, I wondered if they would care to comment on these photo's?.
Regarding your fuse carriers in the UK, do yours have little apertures on the front for testing a fuse while it is still in the fuse base?.
Also, with respect to that bottom pic, is there no requirement in the UK to rip out the old stuff and start again, when adding new circuits?.(with respect to the multiple consumer units)
Over here, a new, larger swithboard would have to be installed, during any upgrade or substantial increase in loading.
That is a real mess!. [Linked Image]

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
pauluk Offline OP
Member
Good idea to revive some old threads from time to time so that our newer members see them.

This installation had night-storage heaters, so there had to be at least two distribution panels. The top unit is the main panel feeding most of the regular circuits in the house. The small two-way consumer unit below and to the left of the main panel was an addition for a couple of extra circuits.

It wasn't at all unusual in older properties to find extra panels like this added when the need arose rather than a replacement unit big enough to take all circuits. Around here, they're typically added to run an electric shower.

The remaining panel below and slightly to the right of the main panel is energized only during the nighttime to charge the heaters.

The unit to the right of the meter is a PoCo-owned radio-teleswitch which switches the meter to its low tariff and simultaneously closes a contactor to apply power to the heating panel (usually Midnight-7am winter, 1am-8am summer).

On the fuse carriers, we don't have apertures on the front for testing with a voltmeter. The Wylex cartridge fuse carriers pictured above have a small hole in the front centered over where the fuse goes to enable you to see (a) that a fuse is actually fitted, and (b) the rating of that fuse (which you can tell by the color of the body).


[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 08-23-2003).]

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 4
Member
Paul,
What I meant with respect to the small aperture available for testing fuse-links, is actually shown on the front piece of the fuse carrier in pic No.6, as the little white plugs on the front of the fuse carriers.
But, in a situation like this, these plugs are quite useless.
It's only with Fault-finding 63A+, including 100, 200, 400, 600 and 1000A Mains that I have come to realise that these plugs are only effective where the fuse heating is kept to a minimum, otherwise the plugs turn to one solid mass and trying to get the tip of your Duspol through one of these is futile.
In a Domestic Switch-board, I normally open up the panel and test from the reverse side.
Just saves a lot of time!. [Linked Image]

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Grover
Grover
Sebago, ME, USA
Posts: 109
Joined: January 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
333,179 Are you busy
258,345 Re: Forum
239,944 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5