ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (ale348), 302 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#113292 04/09/02 12:28 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 3
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
[Linked Image]

Was this panelboard legal for use as Service Equipment? If so, were there any restrictions? There was no label inside the cover.

Bill

#113293 04/09/02 06:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
with a 4th wire....maybe

#113294 04/09/02 08:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Sparky,

If you look at the lower Buss there are 12 spaces there. This panel could easily (and did) exceed the maximum # of disconnects. The only way it could comply would be with all 2 pole breakers installed there and that's not likely to happen.

Bill


Bill
#113295 04/09/02 09:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
This "split-bus" panel typically has 6 double-pole breakers as the "power section" feeding the range, dryer, AC, etc. Also, a 50 or 60 amp breaker to feed the "lighting" section in the top half. Used in this manner, it would meet the "six operations of the hand" rule with regard to Servive Disconnect.
However, if it is considered a lighting & appliance panel (which it probablty is) it would require a main.
Correct?

#113296 04/09/02 09:36 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
Member
I still don't understand the advantages of a split bus...

Assuming the bus is protected at 200A, the "sub" breaker feeding the smaller bus is redundant, takes up space, and seems just plain silly...

If there is an advantage, can we have this advantage in the extreme? Let's have a split bus and a sub-feed breaker for every circuit!

(See my point?)


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI
#113297 04/09/02 11:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
Member
Bill,

This was suitable for use as Service Equipment. From your photo, the lower 12 pole section was for the "Mains" (before we started calling them Service Disconnects). Then, as now, there could only be a maximum total of six operations of the hand to disconnect the service from the load (up to 6 single poles breakers, 6 double pole or a mixture totalling to a max of 6). The size of the service conductors were based on the calculated load at the time of installation, plus any room for expansion that may, or may not, have been added.

I look at this photo and see it as upside down. I helped install a lot of residential split-bus panels when I was apprenticing.

Even with the "Lighting Section" bus being rated for tandem breakers, over time, I've seen these fill up, and the "open spaces" in the "Main Section" mistakenly (or deliberately) used for branch circuits.

As always, there's no accounting for those who will do anything to get the job done quick and cheaply.

Al


Al Hildenbrand
#113298 04/09/02 11:41 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
Member
'66

The real attraction to this was the lower material cost. I remember a lot of GE panels, bus only, not a single breaker in them. The leads to the "Lighting Section" were factory installed, but the choice of breaker was up to the installing electrician. If all the "Mains" are 70 Amp or smaller, the higher cost breakers are not used.

Al


Al Hildenbrand
#113299 04/09/02 03:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Al,

I see it as upside-down too. I see quite a few panelboards (even with main) installed upside-down presumably to save a few feet of cable. I don't remember seeing ones like this with so many spaces (12). Can you tell if this neutral bar is bonded? I don't see a strap.

I don't thonk this was the original panelboard for this house, It was most likely a 100A originally because there was a #6 solid Al cut just above the panel and a #4 Al running to the water main.

Bill


Bill
#113300 04/09/02 04:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
spark,

The bus isn't protected at 200 amp. It is not protected at all. These panels are fed directly from the meter. They were not sub-panels. I guess the cost advantage was in not supplying a 200 amp main breaker.

#113301 04/09/02 07:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
I mistook it for a mis-wired sub......
[Linked Image]

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5