ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/22/20 12:08 PM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
Beyond Belief
by gfretwell - 09/27/20 12:03 AM
Questioning the electrical norms
by LongRunner - 09/23/20 06:38 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
2 registered members (Scott35, gfretwell), 18 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
No Main Breaker? #113292 04/09/02 12:28 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,631
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
[Linked Image]

Was this panelboard legal for use as Service Equipment? If so, were there any restrictions? There was no label inside the cover.

Bill

Tools for Electricians:
Re: No Main Breaker? #113293 04/09/02 06:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
with a 4th wire....maybe

Re: No Main Breaker? #113294 04/09/02 08:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Sparky,

If you look at the lower Buss there are 12 spaces there. This panel could easily (and did) exceed the maximum # of disconnects. The only way it could comply would be with all 2 pole breakers installed there and that's not likely to happen.

Bill


Bill
Re: No Main Breaker? #113295 04/09/02 09:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline
Member
This "split-bus" panel typically has 6 double-pole breakers as the "power section" feeding the range, dryer, AC, etc. Also, a 50 or 60 amp breaker to feed the "lighting" section in the top half. Used in this manner, it would meet the "six operations of the hand" rule with regard to Servive Disconnect.
However, if it is considered a lighting & appliance panel (which it probablty is) it would require a main.
Correct?

Re: No Main Breaker? #113296 04/09/02 09:36 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
sparky66wv Offline
Member
I still don't understand the advantages of a split bus...

Assuming the bus is protected at 200A, the "sub" breaker feeding the smaller bus is redundant, takes up space, and seems just plain silly...

If there is an advantage, can we have this advantage in the extreme? Let's have a split bus and a sub-feed breaker for every circuit!

(See my point?)


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI
Re: No Main Breaker? #113297 04/09/02 11:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
ElectricAL Offline
Member
Bill,

This was suitable for use as Service Equipment. From your photo, the lower 12 pole section was for the "Mains" (before we started calling them Service Disconnects). Then, as now, there could only be a maximum total of six operations of the hand to disconnect the service from the load (up to 6 single poles breakers, 6 double pole or a mixture totalling to a max of 6). The size of the service conductors were based on the calculated load at the time of installation, plus any room for expansion that may, or may not, have been added.

I look at this photo and see it as upside down. I helped install a lot of residential split-bus panels when I was apprenticing.

Even with the "Lighting Section" bus being rated for tandem breakers, over time, I've seen these fill up, and the "open spaces" in the "Main Section" mistakenly (or deliberately) used for branch circuits.

As always, there's no accounting for those who will do anything to get the job done quick and cheaply.

Al


Al Hildenbrand
Re: No Main Breaker? #113298 04/09/02 11:41 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
ElectricAL Offline
Member
'66

The real attraction to this was the lower material cost. I remember a lot of GE panels, bus only, not a single breaker in them. The leads to the "Lighting Section" were factory installed, but the choice of breaker was up to the installing electrician. If all the "Mains" are 70 Amp or smaller, the higher cost breakers are not used.

Al


Al Hildenbrand
Re: No Main Breaker? #113299 04/09/02 03:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Al,

I see it as upside-down too. I see quite a few panelboards (even with main) installed upside-down presumably to save a few feet of cable. I don't remember seeing ones like this with so many spaces (12). Can you tell if this neutral bar is bonded? I don't see a strap.

I don't thonk this was the original panelboard for this house, It was most likely a 100A originally because there was a #6 solid Al cut just above the panel and a #4 Al running to the water main.

Bill


Bill
Re: No Main Breaker? #113300 04/09/02 04:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline
Member
spark,

The bus isn't protected at 200 amp. It is not protected at all. These panels are fed directly from the meter. They were not sub-panels. I guess the cost advantage was in not supplying a 200 amp main breaker.

Re: No Main Breaker? #113301 04/09/02 07:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
I mistook it for a mis-wired sub......
[Linked Image]

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
lil suzi
lil suzi
Midwest
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
Popular Topics(Views)
270,731 Are you busy
204,964 Re: Forum
193,075 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3