|
|
|
0 members (),
1,164
guests, and
26
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
Member
|
Ok, I think I finally see it. It looks like there might be a slight violation on a few of those cables. Less than 6" of free conductor.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,440
Member
|
What are those lugs from???
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
"Less than 6" of free conductor"
But there is more than 3" outside the box.
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,293
Member
|
What are those lugs from??? Those are Power Distribution Blocks. They're often used in machinery control cabinets, right after the main disconnect. The smaller wires are run to individual fuses or C/Bs. Ironically, the 3 pole model costs, by itself, just about the same amount as a small load center and 8 single pole C/Bs
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 68
Member
|
I see only one violation..... Well err.. let me rephrase that? I only know of one violation that could be there..... And that would be energizing this mess!!!!
I'll bring the hot dogs anyone have buns?
Be Fair, Be Safe
Just don't be Fairly Safe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Member
|
so they took a 12-2 from a 50 amp breaker Now we know why they didn't put in it an enclosure. The 12-2 needs all the free-flow ventilation it can get! ![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/eek.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,440
Member
|
Cmon Paul.... Thats an American wersion of a radiant wall heater ![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
Member
|
334.30 334.30(c) 300.4 are the grounds even connected? numerous violations mentioned and more still unnamed
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 717
Member
|
I got it. There is no fireproofing in those wall penetrations.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 793 Likes: 3
Member
|
Anything NOT in violation?
|
|
|
|
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
