ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,685 Are you busy
169,413 Re: Forum
162,733 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 86 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#93868 - 06/22/05 06:07 PM Does this identification look OK?  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Does this identification look OK?

[Linked Image]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#93869 - 06/22/05 06:40 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
BEAMEUP  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
WA
O.K. I'll be the fist one to bite, It looks good to me. Am I missing something?


#93870 - 06/22/05 07:24 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
It looks like everything in 240.83 has been satisfied.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#93871 - 06/22/05 07:26 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
But what about 240.81?


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#93872 - 06/22/05 07:50 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
Scott35  Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,707
Anaheim, CA. USA
Looks like a 2 Pole frame, with no handle tie across the reset handles.

If this is a 2 Pole unit, then the following would be identification issues:

<OL TYPE=1>

[*] Listed as a 1 Pole unit on both Poles of the unit,


[*] No common trip indication.
</OL>

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

#93873 - 06/22/05 08:29 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
e57  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
S.F.,CA USA
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Looks OK to me, although Ryan brings up a good point, on 240.81


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

#93874 - 06/22/05 09:02 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
I cropped the image to get a close up and here is the rest of the story.

Note: UL does not approve they list or label and the CSA I believe does the same.
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03031.JPG
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03041.JPG


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#93875 - 06/23/05 01:22 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
John Crighton  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 177
Southern California
So you're saying that the problem isn't in the identification at all, but in the text that was added to the photo?


#93876 - 06/23/05 01:38 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Yup!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#93877 - 06/23/05 09:40 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
I figured you were talking about code compliance with the breaker itself, not the added text.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8174 MB (Peak: 0.9921 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-25 18:25:48 UTC