ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/16/18 06:36 PM
Air Compressor feeder conductor sizing
by Potseal. 01/15/18 09:08 PM
Under carpet cable?
by HotLine1. 01/15/18 09:57 AM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 7 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Does this identification look OK? #93868
06/22/05 05:07 PM
06/22/05 05:07 PM
Joe Tedesco  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Does this identification look OK?

[Linked Image]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93869
06/22/05 05:40 PM
06/22/05 05:40 PM
BEAMEUP  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
WA
O.K. I'll be the fist one to bite, It looks good to me. Am I missing something?

Re: Does this identification look OK? #93870
06/22/05 06:24 PM
06/22/05 06:24 PM
R
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
It looks like everything in 240.83 has been satisfied.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93871
06/22/05 06:26 PM
06/22/05 06:26 PM
R
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
But what about 240.81?


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93872
06/22/05 06:50 PM
06/22/05 06:50 PM
Scott35  Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,708
Anaheim, CA. USA
Looks like a 2 Pole frame, with no handle tie across the reset handles.

If this is a 2 Pole unit, then the following would be identification issues:

<OL TYPE=1>

[*] Listed as a 1 Pole unit on both Poles of the unit,


[*] No common trip indication.
</OL>

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93873
06/22/05 07:29 PM
06/22/05 07:29 PM
E
e57  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
S.F.,CA USA
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Looks OK to me, although Ryan brings up a good point, on 240.81


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93874
06/22/05 08:02 PM
06/22/05 08:02 PM
Joe Tedesco  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
I cropped the image to get a close up and here is the rest of the story.

Note: UL does not approve they list or label and the CSA I believe does the same.
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03031.JPG
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03041.JPG


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93875
06/23/05 12:22 PM
06/23/05 12:22 PM
J
John Crighton  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 177
Southern California
So you're saying that the problem isn't in the identification at all, but in the text that was added to the photo?

Re: Does this identification look OK? #93876
06/23/05 12:38 PM
06/23/05 12:38 PM
Joe Tedesco  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Yup!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: Does this identification look OK? #93877
06/23/05 08:40 PM
06/23/05 08:40 PM
R
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
I figured you were talking about code compliance with the breaker itself, not the added text.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,263
Joined: December 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 23
Admin 20
Potseal 13
Popular Topics(Views)
243,516 Are you busy
180,314 Re: Forum
170,811 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.027s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 1.0232 MB (Peak: 1.2012 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-17 09:22:08 UTC