Smoky?
by gfretwell - 06/09/23 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
6
guests, and
7
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Does this identification look OK? ![[Linked Image from nachi.org]](http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/a/answer.jpg)
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
Member
|
O.K. I'll be the fist one to bite, It looks good to me. Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
Moderator
|
It looks like everything in 240.83 has been satisfied.
Ryan Jackson, Salt Lake City
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
Moderator
|
Ryan Jackson, Salt Lake City
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,722
Broom Pusher and Member
|
Looks like a 2 Pole frame, with no handle tie across the reset handles.
If this is a 2 Pole unit, then the following would be identification issues:
<OL TYPE=1>
[*] Listed as a 1 Pole unit on both Poles of the unit,
[*] No common trip indication. </OL>
Scott35
Scott " 35 " Thompson Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Looks OK to me, although Ryan brings up a good point, on 240.81
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 178
Member
|
So you're saying that the problem isn't in the identification at all, but in the text that was added to the photo?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
Moderator
|
I figured you were talking about code compliance with the breaker itself, not the added text.
Ryan Jackson, Salt Lake City
|
|
|
Posts: 812
Joined: April 2004
|
|
|
|