ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Smoky?
by gfretwell - 06/09/23 11:23 AM
Historical NEC Info
by gfretwell - 06/03/23 02:15 PM
Water heater 208 vs 240
by gfretwell - 06/02/23 06:26 PM
Help Finding Fault
by gfretwell - 05/30/23 10:05 AM
New in the Gallery:
Burger King crown sillyness
Burger King crown sillyness
by wa2ise, December 11
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 6 guests, and 7 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Does this identification look OK?

[Linked Image from nachi.org]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
Member
O.K. I'll be the fist one to bite, It looks good to me. Am I missing something?

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
It looks like everything in 240.83 has been satisfied.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
But what about 240.81?


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,722
Broom Pusher and
Member
Looks like a 2 Pole frame, with no handle tie across the reset handles.

If this is a 2 Pole unit, then the following would be identification issues:

<OL TYPE=1>

[*] Listed as a 1 Pole unit on both Poles of the unit,


[*] No common trip indication.
</OL>

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Looks OK to me, although Ryan brings up a good point, on 240.81


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
I cropped the image to get a close up and here is the rest of the story.

Note: UL does not approve they list or label and the CSA I believe does the same.
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03031.JPG
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03041.JPG


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 178
J
Member
So you're saying that the problem isn't in the identification at all, but in the text that was added to the photo?

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Yup!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
I figured you were talking about code compliance with the breaker itself, not the added text.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Theelectrikid
Theelectrikid
Levittown, PA
Posts: 812
Joined: April 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 6
Popular Topics(Views)
307,249 Are you busy
235,218 Re: Forum
219,311 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5