ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by annemarie1. 07/27/17 03:10 PM
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/24/17 12:20 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
Popular Topics(Views)
239,367 Are you busy
174,822 Re: Forum
167,213 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 51 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#89457 - 09/16/04 08:31 AM Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
mistermike  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3
I'm getting differing opinions on the interpretation of Note 2 to Table 450.3(B). I have a 150 kVA, 480-208Y/120 V indoor dry-type transformer feeding three main breaker panelboards. The question comes from the phrase in Note 2 "shall not exceed the allowed value of a single overcurrent device". Is that value for multiple overcurrent devices (a) strictly a maximum of 125% of transformer rated current, or (b) permitted to be as high as "the next higher standard rating" of Note 1 of Table 450.3(B). If "value" means (a), the sum of the three main breakers is limited to 520 A, but if "value" means (b), I can go to 600 A.


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#89458 - 09/16/04 10:39 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Mike,
The value is per note 1, in my opinion. This permits the rounding up to a total of 600 amps for the three overcurrent protective devices. Don't forget that the conductors between the transformer and the panles must be protected per 240.21(C).
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#89459 - 09/16/04 12:41 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
There is an interesting change to this in the 2005.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#89460 - 09/16/04 05:27 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Quote
There is an interesting change to this in the 2005.


Ryan is such a code teaser. [Linked Image]

Come on and give it up. [Linked Image]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#89461 - 09/17/04 09:21 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
240.21(C) in the 2005 now says that you cannot use 240.4(B) on the secondary side.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#89462 - 09/17/04 02:23 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
cpal  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 162
Cohasset MA
If I'm reading note two correctly it appears to only apply if the primary overcurrent protection is sized larger than 125% of the pri FLA?? In that are compelled to additionally protect the secondary winding.

If the pri OCPD is sized to protect the transformers pri. per 450.3 (B) [pri protection only} , then OCP for the secondary winding is not required.

You may have multiple taps from the secondary of the transformer (as mentioned 240.21 (C) ) to several loads the secondary conductors must be protected per that section and article 240.
If your pri overcurrent protection exceeds 225 A (480/.83)I think Note two is applicable.??


RYAN could you indicate the paragraph in the 05 that references 240.4 I'm looking at the pre-print and appear to be missing it!!

charlie

[This message has been edited by cpal (edited 09-17-2004).]


#89463 - 09/17/04 04:24 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
mistermike  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3
Thanks for all of the feedback. In the end, the local AHJ said we had to stick strictly with 125%; next larger size denied. Sounds like the 2005 NEC will make all of the discussion go away.


#89464 - 09/19/04 01:52 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
From the 2005:

240.21(C) Transfomrer secondary conductors. Each set of conductors feeding seperate loads shall be permitted to be connected to a transformer secondary, without overcurrent protection at the secondary, as specified in 240.21(C)(1) through (C)(6). The provisions of 240.4(B) shall not be permitted for transformer secondary conductors.


*(C)(1)through(C)(6) are the 10', 25', etc., rules, similiar to the 2002.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#89465 - 09/19/04 08:29 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection  
cpal  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 162
Cohasset MA
Thanks Ryan

The reference to 240.4 (B) was accepted in Comment stage and not in the pre-print.

charlie



Member Spotlight
HCE727
HCE727
Delaware County, PA, USA
Posts: 186
Joined: November 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8007 MB (Peak: 0.9650 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-28 00:44:46 UTC