ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by gfretwell. 05/24/17 09:35 PM
210.70 / Wall Switch / When adopted?
by gfretwell. 05/24/17 09:18 PM
Any UL 508 experts out there?
by sparkyinak. 05/23/17 11:04 PM
Heat pump conundrum
by sparkyinak. 05/21/17 08:49 PM
Interesting week
by HotLine1. 05/20/17 11:57 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,759 Are you busy
171,769 Re: Forum
164,706 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 73 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#77060 - 04/19/01 05:58 PM NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
I'm supposed to be attending a Seminar (Sat.) being put on by our local Association. We will be "Re-Learning" NEC (1999) Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9.

Anybody got any "hot" topics worth bringing up? (I expect we'll go through the romex sleeved in Conduit issue again ...)
Any Suggestions for others?

Bill


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#77061 - 04/20/01 07:32 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
Bill;
ask why 300 is 'wiring methods' , it should be changed to 'stuff that don't fit in other articles' or 'NEC dumping ground'

[Linked Image]


#77062 - 04/20/01 07:42 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
ask if any AHJ's have enforced 370-21 of other trades!

[Linked Image]


#77063 - 04/20/01 11:45 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
I still wonder about low-voltage landscape lighting cable depth requirements. Instructions say no cover required, 300-5 says 6".


#77064 - 04/20/01 06:55 PM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
I new Sparky was pretty #. I've told plenty of folks, if you can't find it, look in article 300.

As far as 362 is concerned, specifically 362-5, if I have a custom made "junction box"
that is 4" tall and 4" deep and 60" long, i can fit 426 #12 conductors in it without derating, but if it is a wireway, I have to derate when I exceed 30 current carrying conductors. How come? I see absolutely no differance.

Tom

[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 04-20-2001).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#77065 - 04/21/01 01:33 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Thanks Guys,

I don't know if anyone will have answers to those questions, but I bought a new Notebook to jot down interesting stuff for discussion.
I'll 'keep you posted' [Linked Image]

Sparky, hey - weren't We doin Rops'
Where are We up to? How about starting another?

Bill


#77066 - 05/12/01 06:59 PM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
check out log #3908, and others like them that address 310-15(b)(6)
there is a conflict bettween it and 336-26, 338-4(a)
http://www.nfpa.org/Codes/National_Electrical_CodeR_NEC/Proposals?necpdf?A220-310.PDF

[Linked Image]


#77067 - 05/13/01 12:25 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
Anonymous
Unregistered

Quote
if I have a custom made "junction box" that is 4" tall and 4" deep and 60" long, i can fit 426 #12 conductors in it without derating,
But each can be only around 6 inches long.

Quote
but if it is a wireway, I have to derate when I exceed 30 current carrying conductors. How come? I see absolutely no difference.
I do see a big difference.

In your custom box, you probably can have 426 #12 conductors. but they would have to be running across the 4" length and exiting.
That's 213' of wire.

You want them to run along the 60" length.
30 times 5' is 150' of wire.

As you can see, they aren't that far apart.
The 30 wires will tend to lie on each other and not dissipate heat so well as the short wires running through crosswise. So the limit of 30 conductors longwise seems on target to me.


#77068 - 05/13/01 10:52 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
Dspark,

I don't see why the wires in my custom junction box would be limited to 6" long.

As far as how they are run in my junction box, I can't find a single thing in article 370 that tells how they must be run, how short they must be or much else about these #12 conductors. As long as I have provided the needed cubic inch capacity (2.25 cu in per) I feel I'm entitled to put as much conductor as possible in my custom J-box. 5' of #12 thhn occupies .798 cubic inches.

According to my math, I can install 426 x 5' = 2,130 feet of wire, which is considerably more than the 30 x 5' = 150 if this were a wireway.

The 426 #12 thhn's would occupy 5.66 square inches of cross section. Since the wires are round, I suspect that I would need closer to 10 square inches of cross section, but since there are 16 square inches of cross section available, I should be able to get them in there.

Of course I wouldn't contemplate doing such an installation. If I was an inspector, what code rule could I apply to prohibit this installation?

Tom



[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 05-13-2001).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#77069 - 05/13/01 11:09 AM Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9  
sparky66wv  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
West Virginia
Something about wrestling a pig in the mud?


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
sbi
sbi
indiana
Posts: 47
Joined: March 2008
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8179 MB (Peak: 0.9937 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-25 14:28:45 UTC