ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
Beyond Belief
by gfretwell - 09/27/20 12:03 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 18 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77060 04/19/01 05:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
I'm supposed to be attending a Seminar (Sat.) being put on by our local Association. We will be "Re-Learning" NEC (1999) Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9.

Anybody got any "hot" topics worth bringing up? (I expect we'll go through the romex sleeved in Conduit issue again ...)
Any Suggestions for others?

Bill


Bill
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77061 04/20/01 07:32 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
Bill;
ask why 300 is 'wiring methods' , it should be changed to 'stuff that don't fit in other articles' or 'NEC dumping ground'

[Linked Image]

Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77062 04/20/01 07:42 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
ask if any AHJ's have enforced 370-21 of other trades!

[Linked Image]

Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77063 04/20/01 11:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline
Member
I still wonder about low-voltage landscape lighting cable depth requirements. Instructions say no cover required, 300-5 says 6".

Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77064 04/20/01 06:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
I new Sparky was pretty #. I've told plenty of folks, if you can't find it, look in article 300.

As far as 362 is concerned, specifically 362-5, if I have a custom made "junction box"
that is 4" tall and 4" deep and 60" long, i can fit 426 #12 conductors in it without derating, but if it is a wireway, I have to derate when I exceed 30 current carrying conductors. How come? I see absolutely no differance.

Tom

[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 04-20-2001).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77065 04/21/01 01:33 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
Thanks Guys,

I don't know if anyone will have answers to those questions, but I bought a new Notebook to jot down interesting stuff for discussion.
I'll 'keep you posted' [Linked Image]

Sparky, hey - weren't We doin Rops'
Where are We up to? How about starting another?

Bill


Bill
Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77066 05/12/01 06:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
check out log #3908, and others like them that address 310-15(b)(6)
there is a conflict bettween it and 336-26, 338-4(a)
http://www.nfpa.org/Codes/National_Electrical_CodeR_NEC/Proposals?necpdf?A220-310.PDF

[Linked Image]

Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77067 05/13/01 12:25 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Quote
if I have a custom made "junction box" that is 4" tall and 4" deep and 60" long, i can fit 426 #12 conductors in it without derating,
But each can be only around 6 inches long.

Quote
but if it is a wireway, I have to derate when I exceed 30 current carrying conductors. How come? I see absolutely no difference.
I do see a big difference.

In your custom box, you probably can have 426 #12 conductors. but they would have to be running across the 4" length and exiting.
That's 213' of wire.

You want them to run along the 60" length.
30 times 5' is 150' of wire.

As you can see, they aren't that far apart.
The 30 wires will tend to lie on each other and not dissipate heat so well as the short wires running through crosswise. So the limit of 30 conductors longwise seems on target to me.

Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77068 05/13/01 10:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
Dspark,

I don't see why the wires in my custom junction box would be limited to 6" long.

As far as how they are run in my junction box, I can't find a single thing in article 370 that tells how they must be run, how short they must be or much else about these #12 conductors. As long as I have provided the needed cubic inch capacity (2.25 cu in per) I feel I'm entitled to put as much conductor as possible in my custom J-box. 5' of #12 thhn occupies .798 cubic inches.

According to my math, I can install 426 x 5' = 2,130 feet of wire, which is considerably more than the 30 x 5' = 150 if this were a wireway.

The 426 #12 thhn's would occupy 5.66 square inches of cross section. Since the wires are round, I suspect that I would need closer to 10 square inches of cross section, but since there are 16 square inches of cross section available, I should be able to get them in there.

Of course I wouldn't contemplate doing such an installation. If I was an inspector, what code rule could I apply to prohibit this installation?

Tom



[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 05-13-2001).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: NEC Articles 300, 310, 362, 370, 430 and Chap 9 #77069 05/13/01 11:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
sparky66wv Offline
Member
Something about wrestling a pig in the mud?


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Potseal
Potseal
Saskatchewan
Posts: 264
Joined: February 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 2
Popular Topics(Views)
271,000 Are you busy
205,004 Re: Forum
193,122 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3