ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,788 Are you busy
169,555 Re: Forum
162,821 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 41 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#197948 - 01/03/11 11:40 AM Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade  
KJay  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
MA, USA
If you own one of the Ideal AFCI testers, they are offering a new upgrade for them that will run until June of 2011. They say that they will now be able to trip all the newest C/AFCI's from all manufaturers.
I don't think this means they will be equivelant to the test button on the CB, but at least they will work.
Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#197952 - 01/03/11 09:58 PM Re: Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade [Re: KJay]  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,306
i wonder what kind of 'signature' is introduced to test a device's efficy that could be anywhere up to 500' (as the wire travels) away

~S~


#197955 - 01/04/11 01:50 PM Re: Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade [Re: sparky]  
KJay  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
MA, USA
Adding to that, with all the proprietary cloak and dagger voodoo behind AFCI protection, I would ask how do we even know that the AFCI circuit breakers own circuitry will work as intended at that 500 ft. distance, since no UL listed remote field verifiable test equipment for these actually exists.
The test button on the AFCI cb or device seems to only test the circuitry at the point of supply. So it appears that the industry is operating entirely on the premise that the manufacturers say they will work… and that is it.
Are they possibly attempting to use the similar situation that exists for GFCI’s and using GFCI “testers” to keep the super secret AFCI design under wraps for good?



#197956 - 01/04/11 03:24 PM Re: Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade [Re: KJay]  
wa2ise  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 782
Oradell NJ USA
A tester that creates the signature of the sort of fault this class of protective device should be enough to tell if the various devices being tested work or not. After all, an actual fault event isn't likely to replicate exactly a company's proprietary fault signature. "Oh, our ACFI didn't trip because the fault that started that fire didn't match our proprietary fault signature".


#197962 - 01/04/11 07:41 PM Re: Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade [Re: wa2ise]  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,306
you mean a proprietary signal?


the one SQ D broadcasts from CMP-2 ?

~S~


Last edited by sparky; 01/04/11 07:43 PM.

#197972 - 01/05/11 10:50 AM Re: Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade [Re: sparky]  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
I think I will wait to see how good they really are before buying one. smile



Member Spotlight
Bill Addiss
Bill Addiss
NY, USA
Posts: 3,878
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7761 MB (Peak: 0.9275 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-27 09:13:36 UTC