ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

100 Year old Lightbulb
100 Year old Bulb

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 163 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#197948 01/03/11 10:40 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
KJay Offline OP
Member
If you own one of the Ideal AFCI testers, they are offering a new upgrade for them that will run until June of 2011. They say that they will now be able to trip all the newest C/AFCI's from all manufaturers.
I don't think this means they will be equivelant to the test button on the CB, but at least they will work.
Ideal AFCI Tester Upgrade

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
S
Member
i wonder what kind of 'signature' is introduced to test a device's efficy that could be anywhere up to 500' (as the wire travels) away

~S~

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
KJay Offline OP
Member
Adding to that, with all the proprietary cloak and dagger voodoo behind AFCI protection, I would ask how do we even know that the AFCI circuit breakers own circuitry will work as intended at that 500 ft. distance, since no UL listed remote field verifiable test equipment for these actually exists.
The test button on the AFCI cb or device seems to only test the circuitry at the point of supply. So it appears that the industry is operating entirely on the premise that the manufacturers say they will work… and that is it.
Are they possibly attempting to use the similar situation that exists for GFCI’s and using GFCI “testers” to keep the super secret AFCI design under wraps for good?


Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
W
Member
A tester that creates the signature of the sort of fault this class of protective device should be enough to tell if the various devices being tested work or not. After all, an actual fault event isn't likely to replicate exactly a company's proprietary fault signature. "Oh, our ACFI didn't trip because the fault that started that fire didn't match our proprietary fault signature".

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
S
Member
you mean a proprietary signal?


the one SQ D broadcasts from CMP-2 ?

~S~


Last edited by sparky; 01/04/11 06:43 PM.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
I think I will wait to see how good they really are before buying one. smile


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,295
Joined: December 2000
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
340,808 Are you busy
266,179 Re: Forum
247,119 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5