ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Windows 10, who's upgraded?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 11:02 AM
How do you find a good employee?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:58 AM
Recall notice: Bosch Solar panels
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:53 AM
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal. 05/27/17 12:15 AM
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/25/17 05:49 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,911 Are you busy
171,920 Re: Forum
164,805 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 46 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#130805 - 02/14/07 09:51 PM Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
WFO  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 202
Cat Spring, TX
OK, everybody has seen the new energy saver fluorescent bulbs that try to compare their light output to the old traditional incandescent bulb by stating its wattage. So the package says it's a 60 watt bulb, even though it's only consuming a fraction of that in actual wattage.

So how do you compare the radiant heaters? I see one rated at 1200 watts of heat, but on the back it says 120 volt, 10 amp.
How is this any more efficient than old fashioned strip heat?

More to the point, is there a way to compare the efficiency of a radiant heater to its actual watt use? I've never seen a BTU rating on one.


Tools for Electricians:

#130806 - 02/15/07 07:56 AM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,206
Chesapeake, VA
If you put 1200 Watts into a cheap electric heater of any type, you're going to get 1200 Watts out. A radiant heater may produce more radiant heat than convective/conductive heat, but it's still just as energy (in)efficient as any other electric resistance heater.

If that radiative heat is focused on a person, I they would feel warmer despite the room being colder, so you might see some energy savings there. But it won't heat up the room any faster or slower than a ceramic heater or any other resistance element heater.

1200 Watts is 4100 BTU/hr
1500 Watts is 5120 BTU/hr

So, you're looking at about 1/3 ton of heating.

[This message has been edited by SteveFehr (edited 02-15-2007).]


#130807 - 02/15/07 11:18 AM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
winnie  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
boston, ma
1 watt hour = 3.41214163 BTU
or equivalently
1 watt = 3.41214163 BTU per hour

This is true for all electric resistance heating.

-Jon


#130808 - 02/15/07 08:03 PM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
WFO  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 202
Cat Spring, TX
So, is the only efficiency here in that the radiant (i.e., infrared) heat can be absorbed directly by an object (including yourself) rather than disbursed with a fan and rising by convection to the ceiling?


#130809 - 02/15/07 11:23 PM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
winnie  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
boston, ma
Exactly, the improvement in performance, if any, is not from an improvement in efficiency, but from an improvement in usage.

I don't know from experience if radiant heating actually makes a difference. Do people tend to keep thermostats set lower, for example?

-Jon



Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.010s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7672 MB (Peak: 0.9038 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-28 02:52:42 UTC