ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 5
Recent Posts
Holiday Wishes to all!!
by HotLine1. 12/15/17 07:20 PM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 12/15/17 07:15 PM
2017 NEC Changes
by HotLine1. 12/15/17 07:06 PM
Casino Wiring methods
by HotLine1. 12/09/17 10:44 AM
Ground wire Size to water Line.
by HotLine1. 12/05/17 12:11 PM
New in the Gallery:
Gallery Test
Popular Topics(Views)
243,070 Are you busy
179,504 Re: Forum
170,425 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 8 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#130805 - 02/14/07 08:51 PM Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
WFO  Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 202
Cat Spring, TX
OK, everybody has seen the new energy saver fluorescent bulbs that try to compare their light output to the old traditional incandescent bulb by stating its wattage. So the package says it's a 60 watt bulb, even though it's only consuming a fraction of that in actual wattage.

So how do you compare the radiant heaters? I see one rated at 1200 watts of heat, but on the back it says 120 volt, 10 amp.
How is this any more efficient than old fashioned strip heat?

More to the point, is there a way to compare the efficiency of a radiant heater to its actual watt use? I've never seen a BTU rating on one.

Tools for Electricians:

#130806 - 02/15/07 06:56 AM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
SteveFehr  Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
Chesapeake, VA
If you put 1200 Watts into a cheap electric heater of any type, you're going to get 1200 Watts out. A radiant heater may produce more radiant heat than convective/conductive heat, but it's still just as energy (in)efficient as any other electric resistance heater.

If that radiative heat is focused on a person, I they would feel warmer despite the room being colder, so you might see some energy savings there. But it won't heat up the room any faster or slower than a ceramic heater or any other resistance element heater.

1200 Watts is 4100 BTU/hr
1500 Watts is 5120 BTU/hr

So, you're looking at about 1/3 ton of heating.

[This message has been edited by SteveFehr (edited 02-15-2007).]

#130807 - 02/15/07 10:18 AM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
winnie  Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
boston, ma
1 watt hour = 3.41214163 BTU
or equivalently
1 watt = 3.41214163 BTU per hour

This is true for all electric resistance heating.


#130808 - 02/15/07 07:03 PM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
WFO  Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 202
Cat Spring, TX
So, is the only efficiency here in that the radiant (i.e., infrared) heat can be absorbed directly by an object (including yourself) rather than disbursed with a fan and rising by convection to the ceiling?

#130809 - 02/15/07 10:23 PM Re: Radiant heat vs BTU's?  
winnie  Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
boston, ma
Exactly, the improvement in performance, if any, is not from an improvement in efficiency, but from an improvement in usage.

I don't know from experience if radiant heating actually makes a difference. Do people tend to keep thermostats set lower, for example?


Member Spotlight
Posts: 3,460
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman


Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7680 MB (Peak: 0.9045 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-12-16 09:15:02 UTC