ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,655 Are you busy
169,358 Re: Forum
162,692 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 66 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#122582 - 12/03/05 12:01 AM Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
electure  Offline

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
300.5 (D)(3) Requires a warning ribbon at least a foot above unencased service conductors that are buried more than 18" deep.
Don't you think that this should be required on other underground installations as well?

[Linked Image]

Tools for Electricians:

#122583 - 12/03/05 12:08 AM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
skingusmc  Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 116
Simi Valley, CA USA
You mean this isn't a "warning" to AHJs? (grin)



#122584 - 12/03/05 05:08 AM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
Trumpy  Offline

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
Did you get that strip from the local cemetary?. [Linked Image]

Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#122585 - 12/03/05 05:33 PM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
I think the proper cite(s) would be 90.2 and 90.4.
(Especially in regards to enforcing non-existant requirements or the use of no-existant equipment).

#122586 - 12/03/05 08:58 PM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
e57  Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Upon finding this tape in the ground do you hand dig, or continue with a back-hoe?

Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

#122587 - 12/05/05 08:53 PM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
electure  Offline

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
OK, maybe the example is a little silly, but I think my question is a valid one.

Why should it be a requirement to put a warning ribbon above a 100 Amp residential 120/240 Volt service lateral, maybe fed by a 25 KVA transformer, when there's no requirement to provide the same type of warning above a 1000 Amp 480 Volt feeder?

Is my reasoning even goofier than usual? What am I missing here?

#122588 - 12/05/05 09:24 PM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
iwire  Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
IMO your right, it makes no sense to me that this only applies to service conductors.

Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician

#122589 - 12/05/05 09:28 PM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
HLCbuild  Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 209
Herndon,Va USA
You guys are thinking too much again!

#122590 - 12/06/05 10:37 AM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
sandsnow  Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 167
Irvine, CA, USA
Read 300.5(D) It is refering to direct buried conductors and cables. This does not apply to service conductors or laterals in conduit.

I've never heard of any direct buried cables encased in concrete though.

I agree that UG conductors in general need more attention from the code in regards to protection.

Larry LeVoir
City of Irvine, CA

#122591 - 12/06/05 02:54 PM Re: Scope of 300.5 (D) (3)  
resqcapt19  Offline
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
It also doesn't make any sense that this only applies to condutors installed in a trench, not those installed by directional boring.


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
SI,New Zealand
Posts: 8,211
Joined: July 2002
Show All Member Profiles 

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8176 MB (Peak: 0.9927 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-24 23:03:58 UTC