ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by sparky. 04/29/17 05:59 PM
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
235,037 Are you busy
169,878 Re: Forum
163,068 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 85 guests, and 7 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#112366 - 06/01/01 09:56 PM Is an expansion fitting required here?  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,439
NY, USA
[Linked Image]
Photo submitted by Joe Tedesco
Quote
Question: Is an expansion fitting required here?


Tools for Electricians:

#112367 - 06/02/01 02:58 PM Re: Is an expansion fitting required here?  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
The answer to this is easier to find in the '99 NEC than the '96. The table for the expansion of PVC has been moved to Article 347 from an obscure spot in Chapter 9.
­ If that conduit is 4' long, and the temperature change is 130°, the answer would be no. (5.3"X.04=.212", which is less than 1/4")
However, if it's 5' long, with a 130° change in temp,5.3"X.05=.265", one would be required.


#112368 - 06/02/01 05:43 PM Re: Is an expansion fitting required here?  
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
Temperatures not withstanding, if frost heave is a problem, then an expansion fitting would be required. Look in the misc. section of the code, 300-5(j)

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

#112369 - 06/02/01 05:55 PM Re: Is an expansion fitting required here?  
Anonymous
Unregistered

I wouldn't expect frost to be a problem if the conduit extends below the frost line.

The temperature change of the portion below ground is narrower.

Frost can heave inches in certain soils. A simple expansion joint won't solve that problem.


#112370 - 06/02/01 05:55 PM Re: Is an expansion fitting required here?  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
Thanks, I never thought about that, being from So.CA. That's one thing that's so good about the BB, is that I'm able to learn about circumstances and reasons for other locations. (Is this what you guys were calling a "frosty"?) I just thought of the 130° as being a pretty extreme variance


#112371 - 06/02/01 10:13 PM Re: Is an expansion fitting required here?  
golf junkie  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
York, NE
With the last code review our AHJ decided that all transitions from above or below grade must have expansion fittings. I have had to pull a direct buried service lateral and install a expansion joint when the pipe ended 18" below grade.

I agree that the expansion joint is a good idea when running continuos conduit.....but when direct burial is used, it's ridiculous

GJ



Member Spotlight
cookcc
cookcc
California ,Long Beach
Posts: 28
Joined: May 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7753 MB (Peak: 0.9231 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-30 18:31:40 UTC