ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
sparky 5
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by sparky. 04/29/17 05:59 PM
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,977 Are you busy
169,808 Re: Forum
163,015 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 75 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#101883 - 12/11/03 07:50 PM Canadian Electrical Code Part 1 proposed Revisions  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,439
NY, USA
Quote

This is your chance to comment on Canadian Electrical Code Part 1 proposed revisions and interpretation issues (subjects) for the 2006' code cycle.

The Part 1 committee refers to each proposed revisions or interpretations as "subjects". Each subject is assigned a subject number e.g. "Subject No.2852". When I receive a Subject I will forward each as an "Adobe Acrobat PDF file".

Please reply with comments regarding the attached Part 1 Subject by December 31st. 2003 '. When replying please indicate agreement or disagreement with the Sub-committee's recommendation

All comments I receive will be forwarded to the Part 1 Committee

Tony Moscioni
Electrical Inspector
416.991.4145
Subject 2852

Subject 2897-38

Subject 3043

Subject 3061

Subject 3066

Subject 3094

Subject 3099

Subject 3111

Subject 3132

Subject 3133

Subject 3135

Subject 3136

Subject 3139


Tools for Electricians:

#101884 - 01/14/04 04:35 PM Re: Canadian Electrical Code Part 1 proposed Revisions  
DGT  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 20
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Let me think

One of the major issues that should be addressed deals with 28-110 (2)(a) and (b).

It is my understanding that this rule was originally designed for the installation of fire protection systems that wanted to keep a system on line during a fire(sic) that may cause a fuse or breaker to trip in a circumstance.

Now it is used across the spectrum as a "design standard".

Once when I wrote an article for an electrical paper I indicated that "....the code should not be considered a design manual. It is in reality the minimum accepted
standard.

A well..............that was then this is now.........

Doug.....et al



Member Spotlight
akmaster
akmaster
alaska
Posts: 70
Joined: June 2012
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7457 MB (Peak: 0.8618 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-30 07:14:03 UTC