ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Advertisement:-Left

AE-Gifts, Affordable Everyday

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 152 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#98720 02/18/05 03:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12
R
Member
AH, now I think I get your question.

They aren't different; in fact, Design B is just about the most common general-purpose motor out there. You probably work with them more than any other motor that isn't an integral part of an appliance.

They are neither listed nor “recognized components” (backward UR). They aren’t subject to any UL standard – strictly NEMA. The rest of 110.14 is generally based on UL requirements.

Horizontal Ad
#98721 02/18/05 04:05 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Roger Offline OP
Member
Thanks Bob, but I still don't know why these types are special in wiring methods as compared to other types of motors.

BTW, I probably should have just posted in Elzappr's thread but thought I'd opt for a fresh start.

Roger

#98722 02/18/05 05:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Hello Bob, and welcome [Linked Image]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#98723 02/18/05 05:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12
R
Member
Hi All, Thanks for the welcomes

I guess I can only say terminations at the motor for circuits rated 100 amps or less for NEMA Design B, C or D motors don’t have to use a 60C conductor ampacity [110.14(C)(1)(a)(1)&(2)] or have the terminals marked for 75C [110.14(C)(1)(a)(3)]

There’s nothing special about the motors, they are the most common industrial motors out there. They just aren’t subject to UL standards that would limit their terminations to 60C conductor ampacities without additional markings.

#98724 02/25/05 11:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
E
Member
Ok, I think we can ignore the issue of 'what about the design E motors?'
The way I see it, it seems to come down to a question of why they don't include 'design A' motors. From what little I've gleaned about the subject, design A motors don't have a defined inrush draw. They are a sort of wild card, as far as design is concerned, with no limit as to the inrush current it might draw. It presents a problem because, as I read somewhere, you have to install it and see what inrush you get before you can properly size your disconnects, etc. ..which is a bit unrealistic. Anyway, since design B and C and D have a constrained and characterizable inrush, then the NEC can safely specify that it is ok to use 75C ampacity wiring, assuming that the 75C will be cooler than the motor leads (which we all know are usually very hot), and so won't lead to overheating the connections, etc. Of course, there is still the question of what happens at the source end termination.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right
Member Spotlight
AllClear
AllClear
Belmond Iowa US
Posts: 44
Joined: August 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
560,996 Are you busy
434,630 Re: Forum
403,418 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5