ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Unusual Well Pump Switch Failure
by sabrown - 10/28/20 04:31 PM
Look at this mess...
by InspectorE - 10/27/20 09:09 PM
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 21 guests, and 17 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
110.16 Flash Protection. #98437 11/22/04 07:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
How are you handling this?

Quote
110.16 Flash Protection.

Switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, meter socket enclosures, and motor control centers that are in other than dwelling occupancies and are likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized shall be field marked to warn qualified persons of potential electric arc flash hazards.

The marking shall be located so as to be clearly visible to qualified persons before examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance of the equipment.

FPN No. 1: NFPA 70E-2004, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, provides assistance in determining severity of potential exposure, planning safe work practices, and selecting personal protective equipment.

FPN No. 2: ANSI Z535.4-1998, Product Safety Signs and Labels, provides guidelines for the design of safety signs and labels for application to products.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98438 11/23/04 10:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
At the time of inspection, a warning label must be attached. Brady , Panduit & others make them. At least one manufacturer supplies a label with some of their panelboards. Some of the label examples I've seen have fill in blanks for available fault current, level of protective gear required, but this information is not required by 110.16 and should not be presumed to be factual except the day the calculation was done.

I don't know what we'll do about marking meter sockets. These are furnished by the power company in our area and on the 100 amp size, there isn't very much room for a label on the front cover. I wouldn't consider the side of the meter enclosure to be clearly visible under all conditions. Even though the power company employees should know the dangers, it never hurts to give someone a reminder.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98439 11/23/04 10:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
I write it up on basically every power inspection I do. I always make it a point to write the reference of 110.16 so the electrician can read teh text to know exactly what th erequirement is.

Just a side note though: If a person meets the definition of "qualified person" and therefore knows the risks involved and has had safety training, why do we need a sticker "...to warn qualified persons of potential electric arc flash hazards"? Seems like a silly rule to me [Linked Image]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98440 11/23/04 11:20 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
Ryan:

How about 70E? Is that a silly set of rules as well?

Why do you say 110.16 is a silly rule?

Did you send in a NEC ROC comment?

The sign Covers Everybody's Ass --- [Linked Image]

Some Qualified Persons cannot read or tell colors so the typical shock symbol might help them to be alert.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98441 11/23/04 12:20 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Roger Offline
Member
Quote
Some Qualified Persons cannot read
I would have to ask then, how did they become a "Qualified Person" and how likely is it that this person would be able to truly meet the criteria and continue to educate themselves in order to be recognized as a "Qualified Person"?

Not saying it couldn't be done but IMO it would be a far stretch of the imagination.

BTW, are the NFPA codes available on cassette for listening while driving down the road? [Linked Image]

Roger

Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98442 11/23/04 12:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
Roger,

Codes on tape have been banned in WV because of the warning label on them that says "May cause drowsiness. Do not drive or operate heavy machinery while listening." [Linked Image]

The way I feel about these stickers is, if you need to ask what they mean, you shouldn't remove the cover.


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98443 11/23/04 01:20 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Roger Offline
Member
Tom,
Quote
Codes on tape have been banned in WV because of the warning label on them that says "May cause drowsiness. Do not drive or operate heavy machinery while listening." [Linked Image]
LOL [Linked Image]

Roger

Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98444 11/23/04 01:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
No Joe, I didn't send in a proposal, but I think I may for the 2008. [Linked Image] In my opinion, you could put a sign on the panel that says "WARNING: IF you touch this you will die". It still won't change anything...ask the few million cigarette smokers in the world that look at the surgeon general's warning every time they light up.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98445 11/23/04 02:37 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Joe,
I did submit a comment on this issue when it was proposed for the '02 code. The original proposal called for the field applied label to contain that actual arc fault information. My comment was opposed based on two things. First, such calcualted values may not be valid in the future and if too low could lead someone to not use enough PPE. Second, the only people that would know what this label means, are people who already know what types of PPE are required. At this point, where no calculations are required to be posted, I fail to understand why the rule requires a field applied label. Why not just have the manufacturer apply the label when the product is made?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: 110.16 Flash Protection. #98446 11/23/04 08:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
G
golf junkie Offline
Member
" In my opinion, you could put a sign on the panel that says "WARNING: IF you touch this you will die". "

Ryan,
I have seen this exact message used many times during construction. It does seem to get the point across to the other trades.

GJ

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
watersparkfalls
watersparkfalls
Washington...Not DC
Posts: 236
Joined: March 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
271,060 Are you busy
205,042 Re: Forum
193,167 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3