ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photos of the Week:

Tiled Backsplash
Tiled Backsplash Devices

Random Gallery Image:
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 509 guests, and 32 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#97906 04/12/06 10:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 99
T
Tripp Offline OP
Member
1)Once USE has entered the building, is there a limit to how far it can run inside a wall without being in conduit? Code references appreciated.

2) How near to flowing water (as in a creek) can USE be run without further protection?

3) And speaking of creeks, I'm thinking of sleeving the USE in PVC where it runs over the culvert (because we might not get a full 18" below grade). So what does one use to seal the ends of a PVC sleeve in a situation like this? Is duct seal sufficient? And should I also use duct seal where the USE enters PVC to climb the exterior wall of the building it will be entering?

Thanks for your tolerance of my many questions. Only seven years in the trade, so it'll be "a while" before I've seen it all. [Linked Image]

Horizontal Ad
#97907 04/13/06 10:40 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 46
R
Member
Tripp,

Take a lok at article 338. This article deals with SE and USE cable.

Chris

#97908 04/13/06 11:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
M
Member
I'm not so sure you'll find all you answers in the code book. How far flammable conductors can go into a building is usually a local code issue. The length could be 0, a few feet, or maybe 10 feet and may require metalic conduit. If this is dual rated, then there may be no length limit, but you'll probably need to talk to the inspector.

Physical protection is also typically an inspector call.

PVC has to be buried 18", and USE would have to be 24". To go less than this requires rigid metal or concrete. If the culvert is a "driveway", you may have to go 24" regardless of how its protected.

You may not have to seal a conduit. USE is rated for direct burial, so it can get wet. You would have to seal the raceway if it was outside and entered a heated building since each end is exposed to different temperatures.


Mark
Kent, WA
#97909 04/13/06 12:20 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
The code is not as specific as the UL White Book, which says USE is not suitable for use in premises, except to terminate to service equipment.


Pierre Belarge
#97910 04/13/06 07:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 99
T
Tripp Offline OP
Member
Thanks for all your responses.


Raider: thanks, but I already checked 338 before posting my questions. I didn't find my answers there, as Markp suggested I might not.

Markp: why a burial depth of 24"? I guess I should have specified that this is a single-family dwelling. Table 300.5 says 18", yes?

PCBelarge: thanks for the UL reference. In this case, the USE would be entering the building solely for the purpose of termination in a subpanel - probably less than 3' from where it enters the buiding. So it sounds like that might make it okay by UL. I just need to find out if it needs to be in conduit for those 2-3 feet.

#97911 04/13/06 08:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
M
Member
Table 300.5 is confusing. The most important item is row 1 column1 -- direct burial cable for all uses except the rows under it is 24". All of those other rows cover specific areas or coverings (buildings or concrete). I think the intent here is further protection and not less. Look at column 2 and you'll see RMC which is normally buried 6" has to be increased to 18" or 24" in most of those other rows. But if you're running this under a dwelling only driveway or parking area (perhaps even a gravel one), then you may be able to only go 18".


Mark
Kent, WA
#97912 04/14/06 07:16 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
Are you using the USE for a service? If so, its not so much a limitation directly for the SE as it is the placement of the service disconnecting means. 230-70a1(2002)

I don't see anything about being near water.

Horizontal Ad
#97913 04/16/06 06:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 99
T
Tripp Offline OP
Member
The USE would be used as a feed from one subpanel to another.

#97914 04/16/06 06:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Quote
The USE would be used as a feed from one subpanel to another

A violation IMO.

USE is not allowed inside at all any longer.

Just today I found that the 2002 allowed 6' of USE indoors to terminate in equipment but that was dropped for 2005.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#97915 04/16/06 07:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 99
T
Tripp Offline OP
Member
Right, Bob - I, too, have noticed that that particular paragraph was eliminated from 2005. So no USE indoors - no matter how short a length, no matter if it is sleeved for that short a length? So what does that leave me with as an option? Maybe UF - but without my codebook in front of me at this moment, not sure. Let's see who finds that answer before me.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

Member Spotlight
Radar
Radar
Los Angeles
Posts: 349
Joined: April 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
363,154 Are you busy
285,959 Re: Forum
264,537 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5