ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
IRC M1307.3
by gfretwell. 08/20/18 11:16 PM
Upgrade the old panel
by HotLine1. 08/20/18 07:00 PM
Light Pole Grounding
by HotLine1. 08/20/18 05:34 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Bill Addiss. 08/13/18 05:52 PM
depth of duckbank
by ghost307. 08/12/18 09:26 PM
New in the Gallery:
Plug terminals
Housebilding DIY wiring
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 4 guests, and 26 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
more derating fun #97782
03/21/06 04:10 PM
03/21/06 04:10 PM
E
earlydean  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
Griswold, CT, USA
Say I feed a multiple gang box with a single 14/2 cable fed by a 15 amp cb, wire-nut seven neutrals, pigtail the hot to 6 switches, then feed six 14/2 cables up the wall and through a single bored hole in the top plate. These six cables continue on to six individual recessed luminaires.
According to code, I have 12 current carrying conductors through this hole. Building code requires me to draft stop this hole, and 334.80 requires me to derate these conductors per 310.15(B)(2)(a).
But, because I feed all six cables from a single 15 amp breaker, am I exempted from the derating requirement? (after all, I am limited to 15 amps shared among all cables)


Earl
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: more derating fun #97783
03/21/06 05:30 PM
03/21/06 05:30 PM
I
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
What you describe can happen in pipe systems as well.

In my opinion it should be exempt.

That said I do not believe there is anything in the NEC that allows us to 'exempt it'. [Linked Image]

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: more derating fun #97784
03/21/06 07:36 PM
03/21/06 07:36 PM
G
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
I could not agree more Bob. each wire will carry it's own current and generate it's own heat which will be additive and hence a large amount of heat right at the upper plate where they are closest together.


George Little
Re: more derating fun #97785
03/21/06 07:37 PM
03/21/06 07:37 PM
E
eprice  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 64
North Logan, Utah, USA
How long is the hole? Even if it is a double top plate and the hole is 3" long, if the total conductor length not in the hole is at least 30" then 310.15(A)(2) exceptiion allows us to use the ampacity of conductors outside of the hole for that portion in the hole.

Re: more derating fun #97786
03/21/06 11:08 PM
03/21/06 11:08 PM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,254
Estero,Fl,usa
I hate to be the spoil sport here but the code is wrong.
The whole derating issue assumes all conductors will be on separate circuits so the heat adds. If they are on the same circuit it actually subtracts where they are paralleled.
If the total amps is 15 and it is spread out across 1 pair of conductors "in" and 5 "out" pairs of conductors the heat generated in the insulation is ~60% of what it would be with a single Romex in and out. Resistance of the "outs" is 1/5th of a single pair and total heat is still I2R.
The only way this current could add is if this was a series loop and full current comes in and out 3 times.


Greg Fretwell
Re: more derating fun #97787
03/21/06 11:24 PM
03/21/06 11:24 PM
G
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
eprice- I think you are mistakenly using 310.15(A) because 334.80 specifically says that "B" applies and using your approach it would rarely be the case where there would be derating of NM cables. And I do understand the Exception in "A" of 310.15.


George Little
Re: more derating fun #97788
03/22/06 06:13 AM
03/22/06 06:13 AM
I
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Quote
I hate to be the spoil sport here but the code is wrong.


I do not think anyone here is disputing that, I said as much in my post. [Linked Image]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: more derating fun #97789
03/22/06 11:29 AM
03/22/06 11:29 AM
G
George  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
The code is not wrong ---

(Assuming that the plate is thick enough that derating is required ...)

The code simply says that if you derate this situation then the AHJ will approve this portion of the work.

If you do not wish to derate you need to do engineering. In this case, engineering will show that derating below 15amp is not required.

Re: more derating fun #97790
03/22/06 11:43 AM
03/22/06 11:43 AM
D
dlhoule  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 73
Saline, MI 48197
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hate to be the spoil sport here but the code is wrong.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I do not think anyone here is disputing that, I said as much in my post.

The code is never wrong. Maybe poorly written in many instances, but not wrong. These examples are where you talk to the AHJ and get permission. When you parrallel conductors you do not significantly increase the heat when they are bundled or in raceway. If the AHJ doesn't know that he shouldn't be inspecting.

Re: more derating fun #97791
03/22/06 02:47 PM
03/22/06 02:47 PM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,254
Estero,Fl,usa
George, the exception in (A) of 310.15 was discussed in the IAEI news a while ago. The assumption is the thermal conductivity of the conductor will tend to average out the hot spot. In that regard I don't understand the new language of 336.80. I guess the CMP has the same issue you do with the exception but they won't address it.
Sometimes I think the guys who write new language do not rationalize it with old language they let stand.


Greg Fretwell
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Tom
Tom
Shinnston, WV USA
Posts: 1,044
Joined: January 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
Popular Topics(Views)
248,670 Are you busy
186,403 Re: Forum
175,893 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.023s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 1.0254 MB (Peak: 1.2008 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-08-21 09:59:06 UTC