ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Old POCO Letter
Old POCO Letter

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 47 guests, and 30 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#95137 09/01/05 12:06 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1
J
jtedson Offline OP
Junior Member
There is a little debate at work about the wording of the code on this issue. In 358.30(A) it says "other tubing terminations" shall be securly fastened within 3 ft. One of my fellow workers insists this means every coupling. While most of agree this is good practice to secure the pipe close to a coupling if practical, we feel the code is referring to a connector in this instance. Any feedback on this would be great. Thank you in advance.

Horizontal Ad
#95138 09/01/05 12:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
Member
358.30(A) securely fastened. emt shall be securely fastened in place at least every 3 m (10 ft.) in assition, each emt run between termination points shall be securely fastened within 900 mm (3 ft.) of each outlet box, junction, box, device box, cabinet, conduit body, or other tubing termination.

ok i think they are reading to hard into "other" forgetting the word "termination" within 3 ft of termination and certainly couplings are not terminating but merely continuing until one does terminate.

imho

h20

#95139 09/01/05 05:14 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
I agree with h20, a coupling is not a termination.

If couplings were to be included, the word "coupling" could have been in the article.

Check the link below for anothers opinion.
http://www.mikeholt.com/reprint_request.php?url=http://www.mikeholt.com/graphics/348-13.gif

Roger

#95140 09/03/05 06:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I had this same misconception and it stems from the fact the code was changed.

The section used to actually say "fitting" a coupling is definitely a fitting.

1990 NEC
Quote
348-12 Supports. Electrical metallic tubing shall be installed as a complete system as provided in Article 300 and shall be securely fastened in place at least every 10 feet (3.05m) and within feet (914mm) of each outlet box, junction box, cabinet or fitting.

This may or not be the same wording in the 1993 NEC I do not have a 1993 NEC available.

Personally I find the change to be in the wrong direction, IMO a support should be required within 3' of a EMT coupling.



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 09-03-2005).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Radar
Radar
Los Angeles
Posts: 349
Joined: April 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
338,132 Are you busy
263,580 Re: Forum
243,616 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5