ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Strobing LEDs
by Bill Addiss - 10/06/22 07:33 PM
How's Florida doing with Hurricane Ian?
by Bill Addiss - 09/28/22 12:41 PM
Tough being a lineman's kid
by Bill Addiss - 09/28/22 12:39 PM
GFCI's pops in large numbers
by dsk - 09/26/22 04:35 AM
AFCI’s Revisited
by sparky - 09/24/22 09:58 AM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 26 guests, and 9 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#93102 05/03/05 11:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
D
Member
Is there a max length for this?

Reason for the question is this:

From a SDS, 480x208/120Y transformer, I need to go to building steel with the GEC, but the transformer is in the middle of the floor.

Is there a max length that it can be, and does it have to be protected from damage in conduit, or can it be supported, say with ty-wraps, to the feeder conduit?

Dnk....

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

#93103 05/03/05 01:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
I'm not seeing any length limitations. As for does it require physical protection-(250.64(B) It would depend on the size of conductor, #8 needs to be in conduit, #6 can go in without conduit as long as it follows the surface of the building, #4 needs protection if subject to severe physical damage-(Hi-Lo type setting), and as to ty-wraping it to the feeder conduit. Someone has to make the call that it is "functionally associated" I'd make the call in my jurisdiction and probably say "No".


George Little
#93104 05/03/05 09:14 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
It needs to go to the "nearest" electrode. I would double check to see if the steel is actually part of the electrode system before actually going there. Would not be cool it it were not. As you would end up with a floating neutral and a kinda live piece of building steel, or being dependant on any ground that may have come over with the feed.

If the nearest electrode were a main panel, and you were feeding from it, I don't see why the GEC could not be run IN the feed conduit, as long as it were sized right for the secondary. And it is an exception to at least the 2002 NEC in 250.30 (4) to come from the main. Its the best place anyway, reguardless of "nearest" IMO.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
#93105 05/03/05 09:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
e57- If he's using a metal raceway he needs to watch his bonding on both ends 250.92(A)(3) and/or 250.64(E)


George Little

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Grover
Grover
Sebago, ME, USA
Posts: 109
Joined: January 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 3
Popular Topics(Views)
297,818 Are you busy
228,536 Re: Forum
213,363 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5