0 members (),
120
guests, and
21
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
OP
Member
|
Hi, What is the purpose/intent behind the derating rule?
Thanks for any replies.
-regards
Greg
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
It's all about heat. When you have 3 conductors in a raceway or cable all them will have a side exposed to the ambient temperature so they can dissipate the heat created by current flow. Now picture 10 conductors in a raceway or cable, many of these conductors will end up surrounded by other conductors, limiting the amount of heat dissipated on these inner conductors. Derating is used to protect the insulation on the conductor from heat damage. Anyway thats how I understand it. In a home it is very unlikely that all the circuits would run maximum current at the same time. In a commercial / industrial job it is very likely that all the circuits would be running near capacity for long periods of time. Bob
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
OP
Member
|
Hi, Thanks IWIRE...
If a system is properly designed there is there still a need for derating?
-regards
greg
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,474 Likes: 3
Cat Servant Member
|
Which de-rating rule? And how can "proper design" overturn physics?
Insulation is damaged by heat. The types of insulation are rated in terms of what temperature they are prooven to withstand, for extended periods, without damage. These rating are the basis fo the tables, such as 310-16. Electricity, encountering resistance within the wire, generates heat. This, along with an assumed 'normal' room temperature, also provide a basis for 310-16.
Now, what if the temperature where the conduit is is not "normal?" We de-rate, or sometimes up-rate, accordingly.
What if the load is only momentary? We use a larger ampacity requirement if the use is "continuous."
Now, what about the number of conductors? Another fact about alternating current is that the current flowing in one wire afects the current flow in another wire. We call this "reactive inductance" or "impedance." Mike Holt is said to demonstrate this by "shorting" both ends of 500 ft. of #14 wire on a 20 amp circuit. Rather than draw the 80+ amps simple resistance calculations would lead yo to expect, he measures onlt 12 amps. Why? His 500 ft. of wire is still wound on the spool. This is also apparent with multi-wire circuits. For example, two out-of-phase hot wires, drawing 10 amps each, and sharing a neutral, will have nothing flowing in the neutral. Effectively, there are only 20 amps going through that pipe. Run a separate neutral with each hot, and you have ten amps through each of four wires- with a heat-generating effect of 40 amps running inside that pipe (4 wires at 10 amps each).
Often, we inadvertantly oversize our wires and our pipes. The NEC is nothing if not conservative. In our calculations, we assume current based upon our breakers (usually). That almost every circuit in a house will never see anything near 20 amps of load, electricians often get away with having huge bundles of romex, and not de-rating. They're not following code, but they get away with it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
OP
Member
|
Hi, Thanks for the replies.
derating is about LIMITING heat/current..there is NO benefit to installing a larger conductor...that same conductor is still in the same temp and the same amount of current...you need to LIMIT the amount of CURRENT..
ten conductors in ANY raceway is bad design.
i think i am not being clear enough here..
say I have 50 three phase motors lined up in a row..
these motors are 20 amps each.
I want to feed them from a panelboard..
how many conduits would you use?
1,2,3, 4?
Me I would use 9 1/2" conduits. 6 circuits in each except one..derating has no effect on this number of wires as far as wire size..
Some folks would use a 2-1/2" and stuff them all in i guess..
Have you ever noticed that most if not all of the tables in the code EVER refer to more than THREE conductors in a raceway or cable?
why do you think that is?
if i take those fifty motors and run two 2" pipes and tee off at each motor would you consider that a good design?
should I now upsize all my wire to a #10 or #8 then increase my conduit size?
NO that is a bad design...
just becasue I can get 562 wires in a 4 inch doesnt mean to do it!
what I should do is FOLLOW the code and LIMIT the number of conductors in a raceway accordingly.
some equipment is not meant to handle but only certain sizes of wire..what do you then?
you cant get a 350 MCM to fit a 200 AMP panel!
see what i mean?
the only reason i can figure is that this was done to LIMIT the current in those instances where too MANY wires are in a single raceway.
What is the largest MULTI-CONDUCTOR POWER CABLE you can buy?
I can get a 40 conductor CONTROL cable but I cant buy a 40 condcutor POWER cable...why? IT IS BAD DESIGN.
maybe I am missing something..
I NEVER even worry about derating myself because I do not overstuff pipes.
If I have a conduit running through a boiler at a power plant and it is ALWAYS 150 degrees in there do I have to worry about derating? NO! not if I LIMIT the number of conductors because as you mention the insualtion is designed to withstand certain temps.. it is ONLY when someone tries to put more than 3 current carrying conductors in a raceway that I am even worried about it.
there are tables for condcutors in free air and in raceways NONE of them say anything about MORE THAN 6.
310.15(B)(2)(a) covers the adjustment for more..this is used to CORRECT not to design!
only 400.5 covers this as far as i can remember.
somebody straighten me out!
-regards
greg
[This message has been edited by mustangelectric (edited 03-17-2005).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794 Likes: 3
Member
|
there is NO benefit to installing a larger conductor There is less voltage drop with an oversized conductor. Less light flicker when loads switch on and off.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
OP
Member
|
Hi,
Thanks for the replies...
wa2ise- you said: "There is less voltage drop with an oversized conductor. Less light flicker when loads switch on and off."
hey...start your own thread!
Thanks but this topic is about DERATING NOT VOLTAGE DROP.
you took that sentence COMPLETELY out of context to make that point didnt you?
-regards
greg
[This message has been edited by mustangelectric (edited 03-17-2005).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 38
Member
|
The derating from heat is derived from Neher/McGrath calculations concerning heat loss factors(delta T) and formulae. It would not matter if the conduit was 24" in diameter, the delta T from the bundle would be the same. Additionally, as a current-carrying conductor with a typical Laminar flow cross-section, the additional generated magnetic fields(eddy currents from skining effects) further add to increase each conductors impedance...which generates more heat.
[This message has been edited by DiverDan (edited 03-17-2005).]
Dolphins Software
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 613
Member
|
With wiring in a boiler room with a tempature of 150 degrees F...you would have to use a correction factor of .58 for a 90 degree C rated conductor.
#10 = 40amps x .58= 23.2 amps
The high temp significantly reduces the current carrying capacity of a conductor.
shortcircuit
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
Same topic, different containers....
So why is it you can have up to 30 conductors in any cross-section of gutter/wireway before the need for derating? (under 20% fill of course)
Why is it derating not applicable under 24"?
What about all those conductors on both sides of every panel? What about junction boxes?
Do switch legs and travelers count?
Ever wonder why 3 or more conductor cable is triplexed? (Twisted clock-wise) PS - you can get 12-8 w/ Gnd MC! And all are twisted the same way.
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
Posts: 61
Joined: August 2007
|
|
|
|