ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 652 guests, and 15 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#90337 11/22/04 05:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Maybe I'm getting cranky in my old age but I have this pet peeve about people refering to 120/240 3 phase. If we look in IEEE dictionary we will find that the proper identification of voltage systems would be to label them with the higher voltage first and the lower voltage second if is a multi voltage 3 phase system. 240/120 3 phase is proper for a 3 phase system. 120/240 single phase would be proper for a multi voltage single phase system. Engineers foul this up constantly. I know the correct way of labeling it and I'm just a lowly electrical inspector. [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 11-22-2004).]

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 11-23-2004).]


George Little
Horizontal Ad
#90338 11/22/04 05:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Amen:

220.2 Computations.
(A) Voltages. Unless other voltages are specified, for purposes of computing branch-circuit and feeder loads, nominal system voltages of 120, 120/240, 208Y/120, 240, 347, 480Y/277, 480, 600Y/347, and 600 volts shall be used.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#90339 11/22/04 07:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 58
E
Member
George,
Your pet peeve is correct. I stand corrected: i.e. 480/277; 240/120; 208/120.
(In fact, I used to be more of a stickler for such things, but memory goes with age, I suppose. I can't remember)

#90340 11/28/04 08:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Joe,

Not for nothing, but has anyone ever worked on a 347 volt system? I myself have worked on many differnet sytems but never a 347 volt one? My old boss even worked on stuff at different freq. I believe he worked on not just 60/50 hz but he also worked on stuff up to 400 hz. He did tell me that BOY, the 400 stuff really packed a punch when you got hit by that stuff.

#90341 11/28/04 09:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
C
Member
I believe the 347/600 volt services are common in Canada.


Peter
#90342 11/30/04 07:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
N
Member
120/208 3 phase 400 hz is standard aircraft power for most US made aircraft. Have worked on buildings that have motor generators to change the 60 hz to 400 hz to power the aircraft or associated equipment. Usually this is set up as a seperatly derived system but sometimes one 400 hz generator will feed more than 1 building.
And ya 400 hz bits worse than 60hz. [Linked Image]


ed
#90343 11/30/04 02:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,024
Likes: 37
G
Member
They used 400hz in big computer rooms since the 60s. It is getting phased out but you still see some.


Greg Fretwell
Horizontal Ad
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Advertisement:-Right
Member Spotlight
togol
togol
NW In. USA
Posts: 421
Joined: September 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 5
davey 1
Popular Topics(Views)
552,294 Are you busy
426,966 Re: Forum
397,432 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5