ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 43 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#89971 10/26/04 08:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 86
N
Member
Have a 100 amp main breaker panel in a residence. Have to add a sub panel and plan to feed it with #4's and use a sub feed lug instead of a breaker. The sub panel is then protected by the 100 amp main breaker. Any code violation here?
Ron

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians

#89972 10/26/04 09:30 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 650
W
Member
I would double check the stab ratings on the main panel that is feeding the sub. Some panels limit the maximum current ratings of loads connected to a single bus stab.

Also the use of #4s falls right onto an ugly bit of NEC 310.15(B)(6). #4Cu is permitted to be protected with a 100A OCPD when it is used to supply the _main_ power feed of a single residence. #4Cu does not have sufficient ampacity to be protected at 100A _in general_, but for the specific load described in 310.15(B)(6) it is permitted to do so. This means that #4Cu is _not_ sufficient for the feed to a 100A subpanel.

But there is yet another exception, which is that the feed to any subpanel in a residence is not required to be larger than the main feed. So I think that using the #4Cu as you describe will be okay until such time as the main service is upgraded, at which point you will need to protect the subpanel at less than 100A.

-Jon


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5