ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Square D "All-In-One" Panelboard
by NORCAL - 11/30/21 12:48 PM
Where is Everyone?
by luckyshadow - 11/21/21 10:14 AM
It's been an interesting career
by The Watt Doctor - 11/19/21 09:56 AM
Well I am back to stay (nearly 6 years)
by The Watt Doctor - 11/19/21 09:17 AM
Motor Load Relationships Between Fans and Pumps
by The Watt Doctor - 11/18/21 09:24 AM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 20 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#81387 08/06/02 09:19 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4
C
Junior Member
Reference NFPA 70E Table 3-3.9.1 Hazard Risk Category Classifications.

600V Class MCCs

Work on energized parts, including voltage testing has a Hazard/Risk of 2*

2* means that a double-layered switching hood and hearing protection are required for this task in addition to other ….requirements of Table 3-3.9.2 of part II.

Is this indicating a hood must be worn to take voltage reading in a MCC bucket??


Thanx CB
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#81388 08/06/02 02:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
That would be my understanding.
FYI,

Our company considers testing for the presence of, or measuring the level of voltage at the MCC to be classified as "Testing" or "Diagnostic". In which case we reduce the PPE requirement to :
Calorie-rated Arc-shield.
6 ounce Nomex clothing.
Safety glasses.
Heavy-duty leather gloves.

Anything beyond that reguires:
Switchmans hood.
Switchmans jacket.
6 ounce Nomex clothing.
Safety glasses.
Voltage-rated gloves.

#81389 08/06/02 03:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
Redsy — Is that voltmeter IEC/EN 61010-1 "category" rating [UL3111 comparable, supposedly] being given any consideration where you work?

#81390 08/07/02 06:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
Bjarney,

The only consideration given to the type of voltmeter is that it be "single function". This way you can not have it on the wrong function.
I have a Tegam 125 Voltman, and interestingly, it shows no category rating.
I'll check the paperwork.

#81391 08/07/02 03:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 127
G
Member
Hate to throw this in, but feel I have to.

If there is any 480 exposed in the bucket you are working "on or near" 480 and the hood is required. If you short out the 480 to ground or phase to phase with the probes the combustion by-products will likely be inhaled. This is the main cause of death or severe injuries in this scenario.

Gerald POwell

#81392 08/08/02 03:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 29
D
Member
Start with 2-1.3.3.3 to see how to identify the required PPE. This section details the two ways to identify the required PPE for a task.

The first is as you suggested, find the task in Table 3-3.9.1 of NFPA 70E-2000 and note the hazard/risk catagory. Then go to Table 3-3.9.2 of NFPA 70E-2000 to find the PPE required for that task. This is a general table and I can see where some instances are conservative and others may be inadequate. It all depends upon the available fault current and the overcurrent device and operating time that is protecting the circuit.

The other way is to calculate the incident energy available based upon a selected working distance. The FR clothing and PPE used must be rated for this amount or higher value of incident energy.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
CharlieE
CharlieE
Indianapolis
Posts: 201
Joined: April 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 3
dsk 2
Popular Topics(Views)
286,325 Are you busy
218,789 Re: Forum
204,945 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5