ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Recent Posts
Photo Editing Software?
by Fridayrack - 12/03/21 05:05 AM
Square D "All-In-One" Panelboard
by NORCAL - 11/30/21 12:48 PM
Where is Everyone?
by luckyshadow - 11/21/21 10:14 AM
It's been an interesting career
by The Watt Doctor - 11/19/21 09:56 AM
Well I am back to stay (nearly 6 years)
by The Watt Doctor - 11/19/21 09:17 AM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 42 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749

This category covers cable investigated in accordance with International Municipal Signal Association Inc. specifications.

The cable is intended for installation as aerial cable or in underground conduit as part of a traffic signal system.

This cable employs a color-code scheme that permits a conductor with green insulation to be used for other than grounding purposes.

These cables have not been evaluated for flammability.

This cable is not suitable for use as a substitute for cable or wiring systems covered in NFPA 70, "National Electrical Code."

QUESTIONS: Why? Do these systems fall within the scope of Article 725?

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 06-07-2002).]

Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
What would you bet that "green" was needed for lights of the same? Blue would have brought the system into meltdown.

At one time plain-vanilla tray and pendant cables used green and white in various combinations for conductor identification. The allowance for leaving out green and white in multiconductor assemblies is about 12 years old.

“NEMA WC57-1995/ICEA S-73-532” Table E2 (formerly K2) leaves out green and white from the list. Example at: page 35 has both “K1” and “K2” charts.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749

Thanks! This information is very helpful. I was always concerned about the use of the cable I described above listed by UL.

Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
If I follow the code correctly, nowadays you can reidentify individual conductors as equipment grounds or grounded circuit conductors in a multiconductor cable, but not the reverse. If one could not use white or green for other than these under the “old” scheme, {although 600V-rated} you’d end up with lots of worthless “spares.”

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30
Joe, this cable is commonly used by the Traffic Signal industry, and is called IMSA 19-1 (International Municpial Siganl Association, 19-1 is the cable spec).

It is a five conductor cable
Red-red display
Yelllow-yellow display
Green-green display
Black-spare, sometimes used in ped signals

Signal heads typically don't have a seperate equipment groudning conductor, but the mast arms are often connected to an EGD.

Many companies make a 19-1 cable, but I don't think a much of it is listed. I'm going to check on this. In fact very, very, little traffic signal equipment is listed. This causes problems with installations where the AHJ gets involved.

I'm a certified Traffic Signal Tech and have been writing a "Code Corner" column in the IMSA Journal for the 18 months.

Link Copied to Clipboard

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman


Member Spotlight
Leo, IN, USA
Posts: 28
Joined: June 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 3
dsk 2
Popular Topics(Views)
286,517 Are you busy
218,946 Re: Forum
205,071 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5