1 members (Scott35),
31
guests, and
21
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3
OP
Junior Member
|
Greetings,
First time posting but have learned much from reading.
Is it allowable to have the main breaker panel in a bathroom/laundry room area? If so, what are the rules that apply?
Thanks in advance...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Member
|
Welcome to the forum. No, No 1000X no. 240.24(E) MAke sure that this room is in fact a bathroom by seeing the NEC definition of a bathroom in article 100. Some of the rules that apply can be found in Article 240 (Overcurrent Devices), Article 312 Cabinets & Cutout boxes (this is the box that the panelboard is installed in), Article 408 Switchboards & Panelboards, Article 110 Requirements for electrical installations, plus much more. Tom [This message has been edited by Tom (edited 03-27-2002).] [This message has been edited by Tom (edited 03-27-2002).]
Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3
OP
Junior Member
|
Thanks for the info. In this case it is in fact a bathroom.
What about if it was just a laundry room? No vanity, toilet, or shower/tub but just a washer/dryer connection?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
Member
|
troythom; greetings. a 'laundry ' room, as you describe, would be ok, just maintain proper clearance around the panelboard......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3
OP
Junior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
Member
|
OK, how about this one.
Sub-panel, commercial building, in a bathroom within reach of a sink and toilet?
GJ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 273
Member
|
not a pleasent thought golf junkie.:eek;
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Member
|
A sub-panel would be allowed, as far as I can tell, since it does not contain the service disconnecting means (230.70(A)(2))& is not one of the prohibited bathrooms in 240.24(E). Evidently, people are inherently safer when they are in a non-residential type setting.
Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
Member
|
"Evidently, people are inherently safer when they are in a non-residential type setting."
Yep... This was on a major remodel of a county courthouse. The job was engineered....so who am I to question? ......apparently this was done to keep the panel out of view.
It passed inspection without question.
GJ
OK tom, how do you do the roll smilie? I've tried and all i get is :roll:
[This message has been edited by golf junkie (edited 03-29-2002).]
[This message has been edited by golf junkie (edited 03-29-2002).]
[This message has been edited by golf junkie (edited 03-29-2002).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Member
|
Golf Junkie, Glad the inspector passed the installation. Evidently, he couldn't find anyrhing in the NEC either, that would prohibit a subpanel in a commercial/institutional/industrial bathroom.
The rolleyes is plural, usually can't remember what to type so I just copy & paste from the smilies legend which is accessible when you're typing a reply.
Tom
[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 03-29-2002).]
Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
|
|
|
Posts: 1,158
Joined: May 2003
|
|
|
|