ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
100 Definitions: Accessible 2023
by gfretwell - 07/18/24 04:26 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by emolatur - 07/18/24 01:05 PM
2023 CEU Course
by gfretwell - 07/17/24 01:08 AM
Is this really a thing
by dsk - 07/16/24 01:23 PM
90.5(C) Explanatory Material 2023
by gfretwell - 07/16/24 12:14 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 286 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#78911 11/08/01 06:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 81
G
Member
Can anyone tell me what are the listed cables with acceptable ground return paths are. As it is referred to in 517.13.
Haven't received my copy of 2002 yet and I have to plan installations for the year year.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#78912 11/11/01 09:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
The Code does not list cables as being approved or not. It only (517.13) requires that:
"The metal raceway system, or cable armor, or sheath assembly shall itself qualify as an equipment grounding return path in accordance with 250.118."
The cable's listing is what will determine its acceptability
Although they mention A/C, M/C, & M/I cable, the only one I know of is A/C for your useage.
This is nearly a repeat of the Q you already asked in another section of the BB.
Check there [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by electure (edited 11-11-2001).]

#78913 11/11/01 10:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
2002 NEC 250.118 (11) Type MC cable where listed and identified for grounding in accordance with the following:

a. The combined metallic sheath and grounding conductor of interlocked metal tape type MC cable

b. The metallic sheath or the combined metallic sheath and grounding conductors of the smooth or corrugated tube type MC cable


[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 11-11-2001).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#78914 11/11/01 10:06 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
lemme see,
the only real 250.118 change in 02' is 250.118(1)
A copper, aluminum, or copper clad aluminum conductor.......
[Linked Image]

#78915 11/11/01 10:53 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
Be sure to check with the local AHJ as to what edition of the Code they are using before you incorporate any 2002 changes.
Many of them in my area are still basing everything on the '96 Code!

#78916 11/11/01 12:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Joe,
Just so everyone understands, the combined metallic sheath and the grounding conductor of the interlocking armor type MC cable does not meet the requirement in 517.13.
don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#78917 11/11/01 04:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Here is the exact reference from the new 2002 NEC. What part of this is not clear or understood?

[Linked Image]

And here is what the 2002 NEC says in 250.118 (11) Type MC cable where listed and identified for grounding in accordance with the following:
a. The combined metallic sheath and grounding conductor of interlocked metal tape type MC cable

b. The metallic sheath or the combined metallic sheath and grounding conductors of the smooth or corrugated tube type MC cable




[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 11-11-2001).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#78918 11/11/01 05:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Joe,
My point is that MC cable that is listed as an EGC per 250.118(11)(a) is not suitable for 517.13 installations because the sheath istself does not qualify as an EGC. It only qualifies when combined with the internal grounding conductor, and therefore does not meet the requirements of 517.13.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#78919 11/11/01 06:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
Joe,
Do you know a company that has type MC or MI Cable that meets the requirements? (Come on, now!) What part don't you understand?
My concern is that if Mr Gardiner specs a freak, it will be a long lead-time item, and will not be acceptable when his EC gets it.
Use AFC's type AC-HCF (as Nick said) or an approved equal, and you can put it to bed.

#78920 11/11/01 07:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Look here:

http://www.afcweb.com/table2.html
http://www.afcweb.com/fieldhcf.htm

Seems like MC cable is also approved for Fire Alarms.



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 11-11-2001).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5