|
|
|
1 members (Scott35),
14
guests, and
20
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Why is it OK to have liquidtight flex and nonmetallic conduit (both having a PVC jacket ) under the raised floor, but not PVC with
a ground conductor in it?
Joe Lusso, Electrical Plant Engineer
Facilities Project Management
303.673.5248 phone
303.673.4551 fax
email: LussoJA@louisville.stortek.com
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Member
|
Doesn't 645-5 (d) (2) permit rigid non-metallic (PVC) conduit?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Redsy:
Yes, and the question is really not very clear. I have invited the person who asked this question to come aboard here on theis BB and look for the help he needs. I always bring these types of question here so we can all put our thoughts into the discussion.
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 345
Member
|
Originally posted by Joe Tedesco:
Why is it OK to have liquidtight flex and nonmetallic conduit (both having a PVC jacket ) under the raised floor, but not PVC with
a ground conductor in it? Most of the limitations on the use of PVC conduit inside buildings are the result of concerns about the fuel and smoke contributed under fire conditions rather than its performance as a raceway. -- Tom
Tom Horne
"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison
|
|
|
|
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
