ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
240V only in a home and NEC?
by emolatur - 05/18/24 06:12 PM
Electricians revenge
by gfretwell - 05/09/24 08:24 PM
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 27 guests, and 9 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#76674 03/10/01 02:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
From the (E)Mailbag:

NEC SAYS YOU CANT' 'PARALLEL CONDUCTORS UNDER 1/0. I HAVE WORKED ON TWO
SCHOOLS AND BOTH PROJECTS HAVE PARALLEL NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS UNDER 1/0. CAN YOU
EXPLAIN THIS? THE BLUE PRINTS ARE ENGINEERED TO USE 200% NEUTRALS FOR PANELS
FEEDING COMPUTERS.
THANKS!


Bill
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#76675 03/10/01 03:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
Was this the way it was drawn on the single line diagrams, or elsewhere in the Engineered planset [to use paralleled grounded conductors that are smaller than 1/0]??
wonder how that got through plancheck [Linked Image]

Must have been the last day before Vacation - both times! [Linked Image]

If this is not the way it was drawn up, then it's somebody's conception of an increased ampacity for the grounded conductor [200% of unbalanced load size].

Technically, it shouldn't be an immediate hazard, but it's not within the minimum requirements of the NEC, so that alone makes it something of consern.

I can see a possible change in the future NEC, as to this type of situation. This one wouldn't really have the expected calamity of a typical paralleled feeder. In this case, the ungrounded feeders [subfeed] would be sized correctly [we hope], using only single conductors. The grounded conductor is being supplimented with an additional conductor of equal size, to make the end result ampacity 200% of any single ungrounded conductor.

In other setups, the total amperage is paralleled across the individual feeders, and is protected by an OCPD that exceeds the ampacity of a single conductor by at least 100%.
Here I can see the need to use conductors of 1/0 or larger for overall integrety and strength.

The grounded conductor being supplimented is to cover the highest possible load on that conductor, which exceeds the ampacity of a single conductor. As long as the terminations are solid, the conductors are equal in size, length and type, and the feeder is derated properly for the 5 current carrying conductors - it really doesn't pose any danger as far as I can see. Others may not agree with me, so please post any comments.

I would not say the same if 4 smaller conductors were used to equal the 200% rating of a given ungrounded conductor. That's going back to paralleled conductors, instead of supplimented conductors.

Scott SET


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
#76676 03/12/01 09:49 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Bill,
Is this an existing building? 310-4 EX 4 permits grounded conductors #2 and larger to be paralled in EXISTING installations.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#76677 03/12/01 02:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
G
Member
310-4 Ex4;

Under engineering supervision, grounded neutral conductors - - -

Glenn

#76678 03/12/01 09:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Don,

This was a question sent in be Email. I don't have any further information. Sorry.

Bill


Bill
#76679 03/13/01 10:59 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
G
Member
The FPN of 310-4 Ex4 seems to give a guide of only on triplen currents.

How much Plant ( location ) load study would involve allowing the Ex 4 to be utilized?

Glenn

#76680 03/13/01 06:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
G
Member
I find several " engineering supervision " 's in the NEC. I do not find a definition.

Did I miss the definition ?

Glenn

#76681 03/14/01 07:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
I take it there is a reason, other than an arbitrary choice of 1/0 ,that the NEC is addressing.

I see no "engineering" or "supervision" definition, but as I am the son of an engineer I will give it a shot;

Engineer;
one who can , through factual analysis,pick apart anything in God's material universe down to sub-atomic levels...

( with apologies to Scott here)

[Linked Image]


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5