ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
"Esoteric" countries and their wiring practices?
by winston_1. 04/23/19 02:34 PM
Norwegian power?
by Texas_Ranger. 04/20/19 06:27 PM
Welded Copper Connections
by gfretwell. 04/19/19 04:46 PM
Israel
by annemarie1. 04/18/19 02:35 PM
Water heater calculationsSo when I count calculati
by watersparkfalls. 04/13/19 12:43 PM
New in the Gallery:
What is this for?
Plug terminals
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 5 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Parallel conductors #76674
03/10/01 02:39 PM
03/10/01 02:39 PM
Bill Addiss  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,905
NY, USA
From the (E)Mailbag:

NEC SAYS YOU CANT' 'PARALLEL CONDUCTORS UNDER 1/0. I HAVE WORKED ON TWO
SCHOOLS AND BOTH PROJECTS HAVE PARALLEL NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS UNDER 1/0. CAN YOU
EXPLAIN THIS? THE BLUE PRINTS ARE ENGINEERED TO USE 200% NEUTRALS FOR PANELS
FEEDING COMPUTERS.
THANKS!

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Parallel conductors #76675
03/10/01 03:52 PM
03/10/01 03:52 PM
Scott35  Offline
Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,720
Anaheim, CA. USA
Was this the way it was drawn on the single line diagrams, or elsewhere in the Engineered planset [to use paralleled grounded conductors that are smaller than 1/0]??
wonder how that got through plancheck [Linked Image]

Must have been the last day before Vacation - both times! [Linked Image]

If this is not the way it was drawn up, then it's somebody's conception of an increased ampacity for the grounded conductor [200% of unbalanced load size].

Technically, it shouldn't be an immediate hazard, but it's not within the minimum requirements of the NEC, so that alone makes it something of consern.

I can see a possible change in the future NEC, as to this type of situation. This one wouldn't really have the expected calamity of a typical paralleled feeder. In this case, the ungrounded feeders [subfeed] would be sized correctly [we hope], using only single conductors. The grounded conductor is being supplimented with an additional conductor of equal size, to make the end result ampacity 200% of any single ungrounded conductor.

In other setups, the total amperage is paralleled across the individual feeders, and is protected by an OCPD that exceeds the ampacity of a single conductor by at least 100%.
Here I can see the need to use conductors of 1/0 or larger for overall integrety and strength.

The grounded conductor being supplimented is to cover the highest possible load on that conductor, which exceeds the ampacity of a single conductor. As long as the terminations are solid, the conductors are equal in size, length and type, and the feeder is derated properly for the 5 current carrying conductors - it really doesn't pose any danger as far as I can see. Others may not agree with me, so please post any comments.

I would not say the same if 4 smaller conductors were used to equal the 200% rating of a given ungrounded conductor. That's going back to paralleled conductors, instead of supplimented conductors.

Scott SET


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Re: Parallel conductors #76676
03/12/01 09:49 AM
03/12/01 09:49 AM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Bill,
Is this an existing building? 310-4 EX 4 permits grounded conductors #2 and larger to be paralled in EXISTING installations.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: Parallel conductors #76677
03/12/01 02:32 PM
03/12/01 02:32 PM
G
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
310-4 Ex4;

Under engineering supervision, grounded neutral conductors - - -

Glenn

Re: Parallel conductors #76678
03/12/01 09:10 PM
03/12/01 09:10 PM
Bill Addiss  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,905
NY, USA
Don,

This was a question sent in be Email. I don't have any further information. Sorry.

Bill

Re: Parallel conductors #76679
03/13/01 10:59 AM
03/13/01 10:59 AM
G
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
The FPN of 310-4 Ex4 seems to give a guide of only on triplen currents.

How much Plant ( location ) load study would involve allowing the Ex 4 to be utilized?

Glenn

Re: Parallel conductors #76680
03/13/01 06:02 PM
03/13/01 06:02 PM
G
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
I find several " engineering supervision " 's in the NEC. I do not find a definition.

Did I miss the definition ?

Glenn

Re: Parallel conductors #76681
03/14/01 07:21 AM
03/14/01 07:21 AM
S
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,372
I take it there is a reason, other than an arbitrary choice of 1/0 ,that the NEC is addressing.

I see no "engineering" or "supervision" definition, but as I am the son of an engineer I will give it a shot;

Engineer;
one who can , through factual analysis,pick apart anything in God's material universe down to sub-atomic levels...

( with apologies to Scott here)

[Linked Image]


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
noderaser
noderaser
Portland, Oregon, United States
Posts: 404
Joined: March 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
254,566 Are you busy
190,792 Re: Forum
180,520 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.025s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9951 MB (Peak: 1.1554 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2019-04-25 12:38:44 UTC