ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
Beyond Belief
by gfretwell - 09/27/20 12:03 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 15 guests, and 18 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Electrical Accidents #76383 01/22/01 09:50 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
The following was taken from OSHA's site. It reports on an electrocution that should not have taken place.

Accident Search Detail

Accident 014392328 - Electric Shock - Ground Fault in Hand Lamp

Accident 014392328 -- Report ID: 0625700
Inspection: 300397965
Open: 10/08/1997
SIC: 7363
Hutco, Inc. .

An employee of a contract labor firm was working with a fitter on the port liquid mud tank in the double bottom of a ship in dry dock at a shipyard. Shortly before
10:30 PM, another employee (a fitter) replaced the light bulb on a portable hand lamp in the space. The first employee picked up an extension cord set and the
hand lamp so that he could connect them. He was electrocuted. The hand lamp and the extension cord were grounded. However, after the accident, the duplex
receptacle used with the extension cord was tested and found to have reversed polarity and an open ground. The employee had been supervised by the shipyard
supervisor and had been using equipment supplied by the shipyard.
Review: X Keywords: electrical,electrocuted,ground fault,equipment grounding ,shipyard,electric light, port,reverse polarity,cord set,e m,
Inspection
Age
Sex
Degree
Nature
Occupation
1
300397965
24
M
Fatality
Electric Shock
Occupation Not Reported


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Electrical Accidents #76384 01/22/01 11:52 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Joe,

I admittedly, know nothing of the requirements for a location such as this. I would think that GFCI protection would be required and could have prevented this tragedy. I am curious as to why it was not mentioned. Is it not required for some reason?

Bill


Bill
Re: Electrical Accidents #76385 01/22/01 02:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
Bill:

I believe that Article 305 could have been applied to this situation.

305-6(a) Receptacle Outlets.

All 125-volt, single-phase, 15-, 20-, and 30-ampere receptacle outlets that are not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and that are in use by personnel shall have ground-fault circuit interrupter protection for personnel.

If a receptacle(s) is installed or exists as part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and is used for temporary electric power, ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for personnel shall be provided.

For the purposes of this section, cord sets or devices incorporating listed ground-fault circuit interrupter protection for personnel identified for portable use shall be permitted.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: Electrical Accidents #76386 01/29/01 08:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
In review of said article i see that it now includes 30A 125V in the 99 cycle.


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Posts: 165
Joined: March 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
Popular Topics(Views)
270,787 Are you busy
205,000 Re: Forum
193,115 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3